Dear Commons Community,
Maureen Dowd has it right today in her column in the New York Times that the Catholic Church, its cardinals and archbishops are wrong in fighting President Obama’s attempt to get insurance coverage for contraception for women who work or go to college at Catholic institutions. The church insists it’s an argument about religious freedom, not birth control. But, really, it’s about birth control, and women’s lower caste in the church. It’s about conservative bishops targeting Democratic candidates who support contraception and abortion rights as a matter of public policy. And it’s about a church that is obsessed with sex in ways it shouldn’t be, and not obsessed with sex in ways it should be. Dowd cites:
“a Gallup poll Tuesday showing that 82 percent of U.S. Catholics say birth control is morally acceptable. (Eighty-nine percent of all Americans and 90 percent of non-Catholics agreed.) Gallup tested the morality of 18 issues, and birth control came out on top as the most acceptable, beating divorce, which garnered 67 percent approval, and “buying and wearing clothing made of animal fur,” which got a 60 percent thumbs-up (more from Republicans, naturally, than Democrats).”
Her conclusion:
“The church leaders headed to court hoping to undermine the president, but they may help him. Voters who think sex is only for procreation were not going to vote for Obama anyway. And the lawsuit reminds the rest that what the bishops portray as an attack on religion by the president is really an attack on women by the bishops.”
Yes!
Tony
Wow, incredible blog layout! How long have you been blogging for?
you make blogging look easy. The overall look of your website is fantastic, as well as the content!
No, she doesn’t get it right. What she is saying is completely irrelevant to the fact that religious freedom is protected in this country, even when those views are viewed by others as being poor, or even sexist, policies.