Crowdstrike: We finally know what caused the largest IT outage in history – and how much it cost!

Dear Commons Community,

Insurers have begun calculating the financial damage caused by last week’s devastating CrowdStrike software glitch that crashed computers, canceled flights and disrupted hospitals all around the globe — and the picture isn’t pretty.

What’s been described as the largest IT outage in history will cost Fortune 500 companies alone more than $5 billion in direct losses, according to one insurer’s analysis of the incident published Wednesday.

The new figures put into stark relief how a single automated software update brought much of the global economy to a sudden halt — revealing the world’s overwhelming dependence on a key cybersecurity company — and what it will take to recover.

The estimates come the same day that CrowdStrike issued a preliminary report on how it inadvertently caused the widespread IT meltdown. It is the most detailed technical analysis to date of the outage.

Businesses are scrambling to recover – especially Delta Air Lines. Delta is still dealing with fallout from the glitch, as thousands of flights have been canceled. The Department of Transportation is investigating.  As reported by CNN.

Numerous Fortune 500 companies use CrowdStrike’s cybersecurity software to detect and block hacking threats. But when CrowdStrike issued an update last week to its signature cybersecurity software, known as Falcon, millions of computers around the world running Microsoft Windows crashed because of the way that the update interacted with Windows.

The health care and banking sectors were the hardest hit by CrowdStrike’s mishap, with estimated losses of $1.94 billion and $1.15 billion, respectively, said Parametrix, the cloud monitoring and insurance firm behind Wednesday’s analysis.

Fortune 500 airlines such as American and United were the next most affected, losing a collective $860 million, Parametrix said.

All told, the outage may have cost Fortune 500 companies as much as $5.4 billion in revenues and gross profit, Parametrix said, not counting any secondary losses that may be attributed to lost productivity or reputational damage. Only a small portion, around 10% to 20%, may be covered by cybersecurity insurance policies, Parametrix added.

Fitch Ratings, one of the largest US credit ratings agencies, said Monday that the types of insurance likely to see the most claims stemming from the outage include business interruption insurance, travel insurance and event cancellation insurance.

“This incident highlights a growing risk of single points of failure,” Fitch said in a blog post, warning that such single points of failure “are likely to increase as companies seek consolidation to take advantage of scale and expertise, resulting in fewer vendors with higher market shares.”

The eye-popping damage estimates underscore how a preventable mistake at one of the world’s most dominant cybersecurity firms has had cascading effects for the global economy — and may prompt more calls for CrowdStrike to be held accountable.

What went wrong

On Wednesday, CrowdStrike released a report outlining the initial results of its investigation into the incident, which involved a file that helps CrowdStrike’s security platform look for signs of malicious hacking on customer devices.

The company routinely tests its software updates before pushing them out to customers, CrowdStrike said in the report. But on July 19, a bug in CrowdStrike’s cloud-based testing system — specifically, the part that runs validation checks on new updates prior to release — ended up allowing the software to be pushed out “despite containing problematic content data.”

The bad release was published just after midnight Eastern time on July 19, and rolled back an hour and a half later, at 1:27 a.m. Eastern, CrowdStrike said. But by then millions of computers had already automatically downloaded the faulty update. The issue affected only Windows devices, not Mac or Linux machines, and only those that were switched on and able to receive updates during those early morning hours.

Thanks to the timing of the incident, organizations in Europe and Asia “had more of their work day affected by the outage, unlike the Americas,” Fitch wrote in its blog post.

When Windows devices using CrowdStrike’s cybersecurity tools tried to access the flawed file, it caused an “out-of-bounds memory read” that “could not be gracefully handled, resulting in a Windows operating system crash,” CrowdStrike said.

That’s the Blue Screen of Death that many people reported seeing on their machines, and that only a manual intervention to delete the bad file could fix — a slow, painstaking process when you consider that as many as 8.5 million individual devices will need to be reset this way.

That figure is small as a percentage of the wider Windows ecosystem, said Microsoft — a company that played no direct role in the outage. Still, Microsoft said in a blog post, it “demonstrates the interconnected nature of our broad ecosystem.”

CrowdStrike said that the testing and validation system that approved the bad software update had appeared to function normally for other releases made earlier in the year. But it pledged Wednesday to keep software glitches like last week’s from happening again, and to publicly release a more detailed analysis when it becomes available.

The company added that it is developing a new check for its validation system “to guard against this type of problematic content from being deployed in the future.”

And CrowdStrike said it also plans to move to a staggered approach to releasing content updates so that not everyone receives the same update at once, and to give customers more fine-grained control over when the updates are installed.

Tony

Video: Jen Psaki Says This Was ‘A Delicious Dose Of Trolling Trump’ By Kamala Harris

Courtesy of Politico.

Harris “did it with a delicious, and I mean delicious dose of trolling Donald Trump and the Republicans,” the former Biden White House press secretary-turned-MSNBC anchor said of Tuesday’s event.

“You know why?” Psaki asked viewers. “Because her first campaign stop today was in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, which is the same city where just last week the Republican Party held their convention.”

Harris’ address “did not feature an authoritarian vision for the country’s future,” she noted. “Obviously not. That’s not her vision. Nor did it include anyone who just recently left jail […] or Hulk Hogan ripping off his shirt.”

After airing footage from Harris’ event, Psaki suggested the audience’s upbeat response to the potential nominee’s comments “basically captures the feeling of most Democrats over the past few days, which is pretty encouraging considering that the weeks before that were dominated by painful, gut-wrenching conversations inside the party about the future of a guy they all love, Joe Biden.”

“Hopefully more trolling is in store, we’ll see,” she later added.

A video of Psaki’s entire commentary is below.

Tony

Book:  “The Radetzky March” by Joseph Roth – An Oldie but Goodie!

Dear Commons Community,

I have just finished reading The Radetzky March by Joseph Roth that was published in 1932.   It was recommended to me by a colleague who knows my interest in 20th Century history.  It is a remarkable chronicle of the decaying Austro-Hungarian Empire that follows the rise and demise of three generations of the Trotta family prior to World War I.  In a 1933 review in The New York Times, it was described as follows:

“The Radetzky March is an example of the way a good sociological novel should be written. Great events are present only as they are reflected in the lives of the characters- in this case the lives of the three Trottas, all of whom served the Emperor in one way or another. Joseph Trotta, a Slovene, son of a long line of south European peasants, happened to save the young Francis Joseph’s life at Solferino by stopping a bullet aimed at his Majesty’s head. For his services Joseph Trotta was made a baron, promoted to the rank of Captain, and rewarded more concretely by a dispensation from the imperial purse. His son, Franz, became a minister of the civil service, but Carl Joseph, the grandson of the “hero of Solferino,” found himself committed by the growing family legend to the cavalry.”

It has received accolades from a host of literary figures. 

“Roth’s masterpeice is one of he greatest novels written in the last century…magnificanet…life-enhancing to read.”  Allan Massie.

“Roth is Austria’s Chekhov.” William Boyd.

One of the most readable, poignant, and superb novels in twentieth-century German: it stands with the best of Thomas Mann, Alfred Döblin, and Robert Musil. Roth was a cultural monument of Galician Jewry: ironic, compassionate, perfectly pitched to his catastrophic era”  Harold Bloom.

In sum, I found the praise for this novel justified both for its story and its writing.

Below is a review that appeared in The New York Times.

Tony


Books of The Times

The Radetzky March

By JOHN CHAMBERLAIN
October 17, 1933

J

oseph Radetzky, a veteran of Marengo, Wagram and other smoky battles of the Napoleonic wars, was one of the military glories of the now defunct Austro-Hungarian Empire. He lived to be over 90 and died in harness. For years he fought the red-tape artists who taught that military science, like the Rock of Ages, never changed. The measure of his success, as chief of staff and Field Marshal, may be found in the fact that during his lifetime Austria occasionally won a fight. After his death came the evil days; Austria was beaten by Louis Napoleon, by Bismarck, and, finally, in the World War. Francis Joseph, fated to rule the Austro-Hungarian Empire for some three-quarters of a century, was not born under a military star; he went forth to battle and he always- well, almost always- fell.

But the Radetzky March played on. It is one of the devices by which Joseph Roth manages to bind together his study of the disintegration of an empire, “Radetzky March.” Through the novel the two-four military time keeps its beat, but at the close the feet of the marchers are lagging, and many are out of step. Francis Joseph himself is dead; and the wind sown by Gavril Princip, who murdered the Archduke Francis Ferdinand, heir to Francis Joseph’s throne, is about to blow down the flimsy structure of the monarchy. And soon the Radetzky March will be relegated to the lumber room of non-vital history.

All for the Emperor.

“Radetzky March” is an example of the way a good sociological novel should be written. Great events are present only as they are reflected in the lives of the characters- in this case the lives of the three Trottas, all of whom served the Emperor in one way or another. Joseph Trotta, a Slovene, son of a long line of south European peasants, happened to save the young Francis Joseph’s life at Solferino by stopping a bullet aimed at his Majesty’s head. For his services Joseph Trotta was made a baron, promoted to the rank of Captain, and rewarded more concretely by a dispensation from the imperial purse. His son, Franz, became a minister of the civil service, but Carl Joseph, the grandson of the “hero of Solferino,” found himself committed by the growing family legend to the cavalry.

All three Trottas are very limited people. Joseph was unimaginative enough to resign from the service when he discovered that the story of his exploit at Solferino had been dressed up for patriotic consumption in the Austrian school books. Franz lives his official’s life by rote, receiving the mail at precisely the same hour of a morning, never questioning his duty to God and to King, always thrilling to order at the overture to the Radetzky March. Carl Joseph himself, although faith is wearing thin on the eve of the World War, is still bound to his Majesty, who, indeed, saves him for Auld Lang Syne from the consequences of a debt incurred through dissipation. Nothing much happens throughout the 400 pages of the novel; life just dozes on. The officers do the usual things; they drill, drink a little or much, visit Fran Resi’s establishment (or others like it), play roulette, and generally mark time waiting for the war which must come. Carl Joseph doesn’t like the army, but has no will power to achieve a career in mufti.

But “Radetzky March” is not a slumbering novel. Just as the Russians can make great literature about the act of getting out of bed in the morning, so can Joseph Roth vitalize these pages about a vast calm before the storm of 1914. He makes spiritual paralysis exciting. Carl Joseph is held in thrall by two symbols. The Radetzky March binds him to the military life. And the portrait of the aging Emperor, his cold blue eyes staring out at his thousands of mixed subjects- Slovenes, Croats, Magyars, Germans, Bohemians, Italians, Poles and Ukrainians- seems to demand the loyalty expended by the first important Trotta, the hero of Solferino.

Where the Picture Hangs.

This portrait, as the book proceeds, seems to be all that holds the empire together. We meet with it in blowsy spirit shops, in fleshy gambling establishments, in cafes in Vienna or in the far marches on the Russian frontier, and in still more shady places. One of the most indicative passages in the book concerns Carl Joseph’s rescue of the Emperor’s picture from Frau Resi’s establishment; to such petty heroism is the Trotta line degraded. But the Emperor’s aged visage will not prevail. There is an uneasy feeling abroad in the army; as Dr. Skowronnek tells Franz von Trotta, “No young officer… can feel really satisfied with his job; that is to say, not if he thinks about it. He feels that war is his only chance, and yet he knows quite well that war means the end of the monarchy.”

The life of an officer in the empire of Francis Joseph must have been boring. Yet such is the richly tinted virtue of Joseph Roth’s style, admirably translated by Geoffrey Dunlop, that boredom becomes interesting as a spiritual state. It has its own wretchedness, its own dramatic values, when it is presented as a state of tension. Herr Roth’s pages are tense. They have a brilliant nostalgic charm. A St. Martin’s Summer coloring is in this book. “Radetzky March” explains much about the European past.

Grudges That Lie Deep.

Incidentally, it shed light on why Adolph Hitler- who was born in Austria- is what he is. Radetzky himself had a hankering for Anschluss. And the Germanic people in “Radetzky March” fear the Slavs and dislike the Jews. Hitler has merely inherited an old “earth hunger” which bids now to upset the peace of Europe, as it did in 1914. The old grudges lie centuries deep.

Joseph Roth is one of the authors who has had to flee Hitler. Along with the Zweigs, Stefan and Arnold, Lion Feuchtwanger, and others, he is now an exile from Germany. And he is one of the galaxy of great novelists of Mitteleuropa whose fate is perplexing the Viking Press, whose list, presided over by the shrewd and intelligent Ben Heubsch, includes the two Zweigs and Feuchtwanger. Marshall Best of the Viking staff is afraid the consequences of exile will show in future work by these writers. The test of being cut off from their subject material, their roots, must be met. Can it be met without resort to an overt propaganda which is nowhere apparent in the poetic and skilled pages of “Radetzky March”?

 

Kamala Harris smashes fundraising record with stunning $81 million haul in 24 hours!

Courtesy of Chris duMond/Getty Images

Dear Commons Community,

Kamala Harris is smashing fundraising records as the Democratic Party’s donors — big and small — open their wallets for the vice president in the immediate aftermath of President Joe Biden’s decision to step aside.

In total, Harris’ team raised more than $81 million in the 24-hour period since Biden’s announcement, campaign spokesperson Kevin Munoz said Monday.

The massive haul, which includes money raised across the campaign, the Democratic National Committee and joint fundraising committees, represents the largest 24-hour sum reported by either side in the 2024 campaign. Harris’ campaign said it was the largest single-day total in U.S. history.  As reported by The Associated Press.

“The historic outpouring of support for Vice President Harris represents exactly the kind of grassroots energy and enthusiasm that wins elections,” Munoz said.

Hours earlier, Future Forward, the largest super PAC in Democratic politics, announced it had secured $150 million in commitments over the same period from donors who were “previously stalled, uncertain or uncommitted,” a senior adviser said.

Taken together, the fundraising explosion puts Harris in a dominant position to secure the Democratic Party’s formal presidential nomination at next month’s national convention — if not sooner. The donor class’s embrace comes as she locks up endorsements from the vast majority of Democratic governors and members of Congress.

The huge haul also ensures that Harris and her allies can compete with Donald Trump, who has generated stunning fundraising totals of his own in recent weeks as he fights to return to the White House following multiple felony convictions and an assassination attempt.

“This is the next generation people have been waiting for,” Michael Kempner, a member of Biden’s national finance team, said of Harris’ emergence. “The donors I’ve spoken to are enthusiastic about supporting her. And even those that may have preferred an open convention have quickly coalesced around her overnight.”

Harris’ initial 24-hour fundraising total easily bested the $50 million Trump raised immediately after felony convictions and the $38 million Biden secured over the four days that followed last month’s disastrous debate performance. The Trump campaign has not said how much it raised immediately after last weekend’s assassination attempt; a spokesman didn’t respond to a request Monday.

Overall, the Harris campaign said 888,000 grassroots donors made donations over the previous 24 hours; more than 500,000 were making their first contribution of the 2024 campaign cycle.

And while there are a few vocal holdouts among the party’s elite donor class, most appear to be lining up behind Harris as they mobilize to help capitalize on her newfound momentum.

At least two major donor calls were scheduled by Harris allies Monday, while the Democratic National Committee was set to host another major donor call in the middle of the week.

Most big-dollar donors wanted Biden to step aside, as did the majority of rank-and-file Democratic voters. And on Monday, there was a palpable sense of relief and excitement among those who feared Biden would not choose to step aside, despite overwhelming concerns about his physical and mental strength.

“It was a cliffhanger. Nobody really knew what was happening,” said Michael Smith, an Los Angeles donor who, along with his partner James Costos, held numerous fundraisers for Biden. “Now it’s a new game. And in a TikTok-influenced world, the campaign ahead is going to be short, dynamic and reenergizing.”

Not everyone was happy.

Democratic donor Vinod Khosla, a tech billionaire, said on social media that he isn’t ready to back Harris immediately.

“I want an open process at the convention and not a coronation,” he posted on X. “The key still is who can best beat (Trump) above all other priorities given how much a danger he is.”

John Morgan, another major Democratic donor, indicated he would not raise any more money for Harris if she becomes the nominee, having already given $1 million to Biden.

“You have to be enthusiastic or hoping for a political appointment to be asking friends for money. I am neither. It’s others’ turn now,” Morgan posted on X.

Such critics appeared to be in the minority Monday.

Chad Griffin, a member of the campaign’s national finance committee and a top Democratic fundraiser in the Los Angeles area, said the party is lucky to have Harris “ready to finish the job she and President Biden started together.”

“She’s the trusted, tested leader we need to carry us to victory in November,” he said in a statement. “I am all in to elect Kamala Harris our next President of the United States.”

With Biden’s endorsement, Harris’ campaign appears to have inherited his sprawling national infrastructure and tens of millions of dollars that his team previously raised. At the end of June, the Biden-Harris campaign reported nearly $96 million cash in the bank, according to a filing with the Federal Election Commission.

On Sunday, the Biden-Harris campaign filed new paperwork with the FEC establishing Harris as the principal candidate. There is some debate among campaign finance officials over whether Harris now has complete control of the funds, although few expect any serious legal challenges.

Meanwhile, Harris’ campaign sent out a new flurry of fundraising emails and text messages Monday.

“Now is our chance to make history,” Harris declared in one text message asking donors for $20.

Go Kamala Go!

Tony

 

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. wanted a White House job in exchange for endorsing Trump!

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. (John Lamparski/Getty Images)

Dear Commons Community,

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is mired in a scandal wherein he floated the idea of endorsing Donald Trump’s presidency in exchange for a future job at the White House, four sources told The Washington Post. According to the anonymous sources, Kennedy, the independent presidential candidate, hoped to manage a slate of health and medical issues. As reported by The Washington Post and Insider.

The conversations reportedly began just hours after a would-be assassin targeted Trump on July 13, but did not result in an agreement. One source who knows both men said that he contacted Kennedy on Saturday evening and the two men spoke that night before eventually meeting face-to-face in Milwaukee the next week.

While in Milwaukee, Trump and Kennedy discussed potential Cabinet jobs and other posts that don’t require Senate confirmation. Kennedy raised the possibility of dropping his election bid and endorsing Trump, despite having publicly bashed him in the past.

Members of the Trump team, however, were concerned that the arrangement could cause thorny legal and optics issues. Not to mention, Kennedy is a well-documented vaccine skeptic, and some are worried that his stance could cause problems for the campaign.

Despite reportedly lobbying for a position related to healthcare, Kennedy promised to slash funding for federal agencies that regulate vaccines early in his campaign. He seems eager, however, to tackle the topic from within.

“All I will say to you is I am willing to talk to anybody from either political party who wants to talk about children’s health and how to end the chronic disease epidemic,” Kennedy said in an interview on Monday. He praised Trump for reaching out to him and lamented the fact that he has never heard from Democratic leadership.

Trump and Kennedy have discussed vaccination prior to their rendezvous in Milwaukee. A leaked phone call between the two from the night of the attempted assassination shows the former president appearing to sympathize with his opponent’s stance.

Though there was no clear conclusion to the conversation in Milwaukee — a Trump spokesperson simply said that Trump speaks “regularly with important figures in business and politics” — the quid-quo-pro appears to violate the law.

Under section 599 of title 18 in the U.S. Legal Code, it’s illegal for a candidate to “directly or indirectly” promise a future job or position “for the purpose of procuring support in his candidacy.”

RFK, Jr. is an embarrassment to the Kennedy name!

Tony

 

The floodgates are opening as Democratic donors are energized by Kamala Harris’ run!

Dear Commons Community,

Democratic donors are flocking to Kamala Harris after yesterday’s announcement by Joe Biden that he will not seek the presidency.

Hours after Biden made his extraordinary decision and back Vice President Kamala Harris instead, large and small donors began digging back into their pockets. As reported by NBC News.

ActBlue, the leading Democratic online donation processor, reported that donors gave $46.7 million in small-dollar donations through the platform for the day by 9 p.m. Eastern. It was already ActBlue’s biggest day of 2024 with hours left to go.

But that isn’t all. Much more is expected to flow in and is already being pledged by large-dollar donors, too.

“The floodgates will open,” Chris Korge, finance chair for the Biden Victory Fund, told NBC News. “There’s been a lot of people holding back contributions that will now contribute because the whole thing — that whole situation was paralyzing our fundraising.”

Korge said he was getting calls all day from major donors who were moved by Biden’s decision. Some even cried, he said.

“People are emotional because they knew how hard it was to make this decision after doing an incredible job,” Korge said. “Major donors are incredibly receptive of his endorsement and are genuinely excited. I think this is going to create a tidal wave of donations.”

On Sunday, ActBlue posted news of the money flow on its X account. Some of that money is going to other Democratic groups and campaigns, but Harris’ ascension was the catalyst — and her campaign was most likely the overwhelming beneficiary.

“Small-dollar donors raise over $27.5 million on ActBlue in the first 5 hours of Vice President Kamala Harris’ presidential campaign,” the post on X said. “Grassroots supporters are energized and excited to support her as the Democratic nominee.”

Hours later, ActBlue posted again to update that its daily total had ballooned to $46.7 million.

It’s among the biggest fundraising days ever for ActBlue. It announced this year that in the first quarter, donors gave over $460 million through the platform — a little over $5 million a day on average.

The development comes after weeks of catastrophic fundraising across Biden re-election efforts. Since the June 27 debate, big donors had cut off funding, saying they didn’t think Biden had a path. And it wasn’t just wealthy contributors: Grassroots funding had substantially diminished, too. Sources close to the campaign said that at the same time the campaign needed to scale up to take on former President Donald Trump, the spigot had shut off considerably, leaving them in an unenviable position.

Meanwhile, Trump’s campaign, buoyed by enormous online fundraising hauls around his criminal conviction in New York in May, had suddenly taken the lead in terms of cash on hand. New filings through the end of June showed both Trump’s campaign and the Republican National Committee with more money in the bank than Biden and the Democratic National Committee.

Joe Cotchett, a San Francisco Bay Area Democratic bundler, said Sunday that donor sentiment immediately shifted after Biden’s announcement. Donors, he said, “are now ready to dig into their pockets.”

John Morgan, a Florida trial attorney and major Biden donor and fundraiser, said he believes there will be a near-term uptick in small-dollar donations. But he added that after Biden’s decision, he stepped down from the campaign’s national finance committee.

“You have to be enthusiastic to ask friends for money,” he told NBC News. “I was a Joe Biden Democrat before I was an independent.”

Democratic donor Gideon Stein, president of the Moriah Fund, had paused contributions to Biden because of concerns over his electability. But on Sunday, he said, “We will definitely resume our funding focus on the top of the ticket.”

Before his pause, Stein had planned donations of $3.5 million that were earmarked for nonprofit and political organizations tied to the race for the White House.

Justin Day, a prominent Florida Democratic fundraiser who is raising money this year for, among others, the Democratic Governors Association, said he thinks the change at the top of the ticket will get some Democratic donors off the sidelines.

“I have already heard from a number of donors who have not participated this cycle who have reached out to tell me they are all in, no matter who the nominee ultimately is,” said Day, who has been the Florida finance chair for Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. “Focus has shifted back to beating Trump.”

Let the money flow!

Tony

Democrats applaud, Republicans fume, and foreign dignitaries show respect for Joe Biden’s decision to drop out of the Presidential race!!

Kent Nishimura/AFP via Getty Images

Dear Commons Community,

Washington erupted yesterday as President Joe Biden announced that he would not be the nominee for the Democratic Party in 2024.

Statements from politicians on both sides of the aisle poured in as the 81-year-old Biden said that he would bow to the wishes of Democrats who feared that his campaign was heading for a historic collapse which would have dragged down-ballot Democrats into defeat this fall. Members of the president’s party applauded him and spoke glowingly of his legacy while Republicans, coming of their own nominating contest last week, called for him to step down as president immediately. Many also condemned their rivals for supposedly ignoring the will of the voters, who in actuality were never offered a real primary challenge to Biden this year. Here are comments courtesy of The Independent.

“Joe Biden has earned his place among the best and most consequential presidents in American history,” wrote Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg. “I am so proud to serve under his leadership, and thankful for his unwavering focus on what is best for our country.”

Hillary and former President Bill Clinton released a joint statement endorsing Harris for the nomination.

Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro’s initial statement did not mention Harris at all, but in a subsequent press release he revealed that after speaking with both Biden and Harris he’d decided to throw his support behind the vice president.

“Kamala Harris is a patriot worthy of our support and she will continue the work of generations of Americans who came before us to perfect our union, protect our democracy, and advance real freedom. She has served the country honorably as Vice President and she is ready to be President,” he said. “The best path forward for the Democratic Party is to quickly unite behind Vice President Harris and refocus on winning the presidency.”

Bernie Sanders, who had defended Biden amid calls for the president to drop out, said he has “served our country with honor and dignity.”

“As the first president to ever walk on a picket line with striking workers, he has been the most pro-working class president in modern American history,” he wrote. “Thank you, Mr. President, for all you’ve done.”

Speaker Mike Johnson and former President Donald Trump led the charge for Republicans.

“At this unprecedented juncture in American history, we must be clear about what just happened. The Democrat Party forced the Democrat nominee off the ballot, just over 100 days before the election,” said Johnson. “If Joe Biden is not fit to run for President, he is not fit to serve as President. He must resign the office immediately. November 5 cannot arrive soon enough.”

Trump, who officially secured the GOP nomination last week, wrote on Truth Social: “Crooked Joe Biden was not fit to run for President, and is certainly not fit to serve – And never was! He only attained the position of President by lies, Fake News, and not leaving his Basement.”

“All those around him, including his Doctor and the Media, knew that he wasn’t capable of being President, and he wasn’t – And now, look what he’s done to our Country, with millions of people coming across our Border, totally unchecked and unvetted, many from prisons, mental institutions, and record numbers of terrorists. We will suffer greatly because of his presidency, but we will remedy the damage he has done very quickly. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!” the ex-president’s post concluded.

Reactions from overseas were favorable to Biden, whom European allies were reported to have been worried about having been unable to beat Trump, a well-known skeptic of NATO and foreign engagement.

“I respect President Biden’s decision and I look forward to us working together during the remainder of his presidency,” wrote British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, still in his first month in office. “I know that, as he has done throughout his remarkable career, he will have made his decision based on what he believes is best for the American people.”

“I heard the news of President Biden’s decision with both sadness & admiration. He has been an abiding friend of Ireland, providing invaluable support for peace & prosperity on this island. His visit last year will long be remembered as a powerful & joyous celebration of our relationship with the US This has no doubt been the toughest of calls, but one done, as ever, with dignity & class. I know that the people of Ireland will wish President Biden the very best,” wrote Ireland’s Minister for Foreign Affairs Micheál Martin on Twitter.

“I respect Joe Biden’s decision not to run for re-election. That justification deserves respect,” Norwegian prime minister Jonas Gahr Stoere told broadcaster NRK.“Biden has been one of America’s most prominent politicians over several decades, and a president who has carried out several important reforms.”

“I want to extend my heartfelt thanks to @POTUS Joe Biden for his friendship and steadfast support for the Israeli people over his decades long career,” wrote Israeli President Isaac Herzog on X. “As the first US President to visit Israel in wartime, as a recipient of the Israeli Presidential Medal of Honor, and as a true ally of the Jewish people, he is a symbol of the unbreakable bond between our two peoples.”

“I send him, @FLOTUS Jill Biden, and all his family, my warmest wishes from Jerusalem.”

Tony

 

Joe Biden gives up 2024 race and endorses Kamala Harris for President!

Dear Commons Community,

President Joe Biden said earlier this afternoon that he is ending his bid for reelection

The president’s historic withdrawal throws the 2024 race into uncertain territory, with Vice President Kamala Harris widely seen as the Democrat most likely to take Biden’s place atop the party’s ticket.

Biden made the announcement from his home in Rehoboth Beach, Del., where he’s self-isolated since testing positive for COVID-19 Thursday night.

“It has been the greatest honor of my life to serve as your President,” Biden said in a letter addressed to Americans. “And while it has been my intention to seek reelection, I believe it is in the best interest of my party and my country for me to stand down and to focus solely on my duties as President for the rest of my term.”

Biden quickly endorsed Harris as the Democratic nominee in a separate statement on X. He said he would speak to the nation later this week to provide more details about his decision.

In his statement, Biden reflected fondly on his four years in office, saying the U.S. has built the “strongest economy in the world” while touting efforts to lower prescription drug prices, expand health care, tackle climate change and appointing the first Black woman to the Supreme Court, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The decision upends the 2024 election less than 110 days before Election Day, with Democratic National Committee members now tasked with choosing an alternative nominee to take on Trump, whose polling lead has swelled while Democrats have fought internally.

Biden’s departure will soon mean the end of a five-decade career in Washington that began in 1972 with an upset victory for U.S. Senate in Delaware. He served as a senator for 36 years, then as Obama’s vice president from 2009 to 2017. Biden returned to public life to run against Trump in the 2020 presidential election. He framed the race as a “battle for the soul of the nation” and defeated Trump 51%-47% in the popular vote.

We owe him our gratitude for putting the country ahead of his own personal interests.

May God bless him!

Tony

 

Artificial intelligence detects cancer with 17% more accuracy than doctors in UCLA study

Dear Commons Community,

A new study from UCLA found that an AI tool identified prostate cancer with 84% accuracy — compared to 67% accuracy for cases detected by physicians, according to a press release from the university.

Unfold AI, made by Avenda Health in California — a software recently cleared by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration — uses an AI algorithm to visualize the likelihood of cancer based on various types of clinical data.

In the study, a team of seven urologists and three radiologists analyzed 50 cases where tumors had been removed, looking for signs of residual cancer.

A few months later, the AI software performed the same analysis.

The “negative margin rate” — a medical term that describes the absence of cancer cells surrounding the removed tissue — was 45 times greater in AI-detected cases, so the chances of cancer being left behind was far less.  Here is reporting courtesy of Fox News Digital.

Ali Kasraeian, M.D., a urologist at Kasraeian Urology in Jacksonville, Florida, said he uses the Unfold AI technology in his consultations with patients about managing their prostate cancer.

“The AI takes the information that we currently have about a patient’s prostate cancer — like their pathology, imaging and biopsy results — and creates a 3D cancer estimation map,” he told Fox News Digital via email.

“The results we get from Unfold AI tell us if a patient will be better suited for focal therapy or more radical therapy, such as radical prostatectomy, or radiation therapy, ensuring we optimize their cancer cure, the personalization of their cancer care, and their quality of life goals.”

Based on these findings, the AI could lead to more accurate diagnoses and more targeted treatments, reducing the need for full-gland removal and the side effects that can come with it, such as incontinence and impotence, the researchers wrote.

Joshua Trachenberg, PhD, is a professor of neurobiology at UCLA — and also a prostate cancer patient himself. After doctors found a slow-growing tumor on his prostate, they recommended removing the gland surgically — but he decided to explore other options.

“I got in touch with a team at UCLA, where I also am a faculty member, that was exploring alternate treatments to total gland removal,” Trachenberg, 56, told Fox News Digital via email.

The “negative margin rate” — a medical term that describes the absence of cancer cells surrounding the removed tissue — was 45 times greater in AI-detected cases, so the chances of cancer being left behind was far less.

The UCLA researchers were testing an approach that uses ultrasound to heat tissue and is “focally guided” by MRI to destroy the cancerous tissue without damaging the rest of the gland, he said.

After some imaging scans, it was determined that Trachenberg was a candidate for the experimental therapy.

“The 3D map created by Unfold AI enabled this team to identify precise margins, target the cancerous area and avoid any functional structures of the gland,” he said.

“It was truly able to visualize my cancer and it gave me a much better understanding of my case.”

Trachenberg is now cancer-free and was able to avoid a radical prostatectomy.

“I would recommend to any prostate cancer patient who is told they need a radical prostatectomy that they take some time to look at all their options, [including] AI technologies,” said a doctor and patient (not pictured).

“So many men are afraid of treatment because of the risks associated with gland removal, and Unfold AI enables therapies that don’t put men through the meat grinder,” he said.

This type of AI technology gives Trachenberg hope for the future of prostate cancer treatment, he told Fox News Digital.

“Too often, we are given only two options: Watch and wait for it to get worse, or take the entire gland out, which often leaves men with lifelong side effects that strain their physical health, emotional health and even their marriages,” he said.

“I would recommend to any prostate cancer patient who is told they need a radical prostatectomy that they take some time to look at all their options, [including] AI technologies.”

AI will likely become the diagnostic tool of choice for most major diseases.

Tony

Why Nancy Pelosi is on a final mission to oust Joe Biden

Photo courtesy of The Telegraph.

Dear Commons Community,

Roland Oliphant of The Telegraph, has an article this morning entitled, “Why Nancy Pelosi is on a final mission to oust Joe Biden,” in which he analyzes the role the former Democratic Speaker of the House, is playing in trying to persuade Biden to give up their party’s presidential nomination.  It is an insightful review of the situation between the two major figures in the Democratic Party. 

Below is the article in its entirety.

Tony

——————————————————————————————————————

When Nancy Pelosi rang Joe Biden to warn him of dire opinion polling, suggesting he could not win the next election to Donald Trump, the president insisted he had data saying the opposite.

The 84-year-old ex-speaker did something few others would have dared: she demanded to speak to the advisers telling him so and implied they were not telling the president the truth.

“Put Donilon on the phone,” she said, referring to long-time Biden aide and strategist Mike Donilon. “Show me what polls.”

Openly challenging the president and implying that his aides have been lying to him would be bold coming from anyone. From Mrs. Pelosi, it must have been especially wounding.

Mrs. Pelosi and Mr. Biden go way back.

A fellow devout Catholic (Mr. Biden used to call her “my Catholic sister”), she delivered him win after win in the House until her second term as speaker ended in 2022. Although they have clashed in the past, he has let it be known that he considered her the best House speaker ever.

And they share the same instinctive institutional political instincts and fears about what Trump could do to US democracy.

Mrs.. Pelosi was Trump’s most implacable foe during his 2016-2020 presidency.

But she also has a reputation as the Democrats’ hardest, cleverest, and most strategic thinker. And she seems to have come to the conclusion that to stop Trump this time, she must first stop Mr. Biden.

Mrs.. Pelosi has avoided calling directly for him to step down. But she is now thought to be working the phones behind the scenes to ratchet up pressure on Mr. Biden to step aside.

Her strategy appears to have three strands: first, private appeals to the president; second, when they are ignored, leaks about those conversations to the press (the appearance in the New York Times of her remarks about Mr. Donilon is a classic example), and the third strand which involves rare but decisive public remarks designed to keep the rebellion alive.

Rekindling embers of dissent

Twice since his disastrous debate performance, Mr. Biden seemed to have dowsed the embers of dissent. It is Mrs.. Pelosi who rekindled them both times.

By July 10, Mr. Biden’s vows that only the “Lord Almighty” could convince him to stand aside had quelled most public criticism from elected Democrats. They did not want to put their heads above the parapet, endangering their careers by angering the White House.

But then Mrs.. Pelosi appeared on Mr. Biden’s favourite morning show to give a very pointed message.

“It’s up to the president to decide if he is going to run. We’re all encouraging him to make that decision because time is running short,” she said.

That would have been scrupulously neutral if Mr. Biden had not obviously already made that decision. The flames of rebellion immediately leapt back into life.

 

The race took a shock turn on July 13 when Trump narrowly survived an assassination attempt at a rally in Pennsylvania. Democrats briefed out that they believed the ensuing furore would end the campaign to oust Mr. Biden, which was running short of time in any case.

But again, Mrs. Pelosi applied herself to the cause, calling Mr. Biden shortly after to say she saw very little chance of him winning re-election.

With Mr. Biden still defiant several days later, representatives Adam Schiff of California and Jamie Raskin of Maryland, two close allies of Mrs. Pelosi, both called on Mr. Biden to quit. Mr. Schiff was described by one Democrat as Mrs. Pelosi’s “drone”.

On Thursday Barack Obama, the former president, let it be known via intermediaries that he too harbours doubts about Mr. Biden’s ability to win the election.

But the president remained defiant. When he responded on Friday that he was “looking forward” to returning to the campaign trail next week, more of Mrs. Pelosi’s allies called on him to stand down.

Every time Mr. Biden looks like he has found a moment’s peace, the pressure is upped on him again with strategic defections.

Record of getting big calls right

It should worry the president that Mrs. Pelosi has a track record of getting the big calls right.

For Republicans, she is the epitome of the Californian champagne liberal (literally: she and her husband own a vineyard in the Napa Valley that supplies grapes to several wineries). The couple live in a nice place in Presidio Heights, one of San Francisco’s most exclusive districts. She has an estimated net worth north of $100 million, making her among the richest members of Congress.

But she has proved her political nous – and reading of the electorate – time and again.

She was one of very few Democrats to oppose the invasion of Iraq.

Mrs. Pelosi long resisted calls to impeach Trump because she was not convinced that it would succeed – and that if he survived, he would emerge strengthened.

She could remember Bill Clinton emerging from his own brush with impeachment with a surge of popularity.

And Richard Nixon, she pointed out, was only forced out because once the Watergate tapes emerged, even Republicans could see he had to go. There was no similar shift of sentiment about Trump in the modern Republican party, so expecting success would be naive.

‘Most effective speaker of all time’

Her superpower as a politician has been the ability to assess support and opposition down to the last vote, and knowing what to offer representatives to pass legislation despite the narrowest of margins.

That skill was key to the House passing Mr. Obama’s flagship Affordable Care Act in March 2010 by a knife-edge 219-212 vote.

She pulled off the same trick for Mr. Biden in 2021 when she ushered through his infrastructure act despite the Democrats having just a three-seat majority. The bill eventually passed by a 228-206 margin, with the support of 16 Republicans.

Bruce Melman, a Republican lobbyist, called her “the most effective speaker of all time” after that vote.

Much of that work has outraged the alt-Right. On January 6 2021 Capitol rioters went looking for her office. Those jailed in the aftermath included a woman who had said: “We were looking for Nancy to shoot her in the friggin’ brain, but we didn’t find her.”

Mrs. Pelosi withdrew from front-line politics not long after her husband was attacked in their home by a Canadian conspiracy theorist.

But she appears to be making one last effort to thwart Trump – by ensuring Mr. Biden is not the Democrat candidate on Nov 5.

While the president has spoken openly of needing to get more rest, Mrs. Pelosi is indefatigable in pursuit of her goals.

“People get tired,” she has said of the art of negotiation. “You can’t get tired. You can never get tired.”

It is now Mr. Biden on the receiving end of that doggedness.