Charles Koch Says Many in the Country Are ‘Abandoning’ Its Principles: He Should Know!

Charles Koch stands and smiles. He is wearing a dark sport coat and a light blue shirt.

Charles Koch in 2019.  Credit…David Zalubowski/Associated Press

Dear Commons Community,

Charles Koch, the billionaire industrialist and conservative megadonor, made a rare public appearance Thursday evening and called for libertarians to embrace their principles, in comments that seemed obliquely directed at a Republican Party taken over by President Trump.

Mr. Koch was at one time among the most powerful forces in Republican politics. In the 2016 election cycle alone, he and his allies spent $750 million to promote the party’s candidates and causes. But his political power has waned significantly since Mr. Trump’s election that year, and he is now seldom seen in Washington. And neither do Republicans worry much about his plans in a party that is much more in Mr. Trump’s image than in Mr. Koch’s.  As reported by The New York Times.

But Mr. Koch, who will turn 90 this November, showed up in Washington to accept an award from the Cato Institute. Almost 50 years ago, Mr. Koch helped found Cato, one of the nation’s prominent libertarian think tanks. By 2012, Mr. Koch and his brother David had given about $30 million to the institute, but the relationship soured and the Kochs ended up suing the nonprofit before settling that June.

Accepting a prize named after Milton Friedman, the free-market economist, on Thursday, Mr. Koch made his first public remarks since Mr. Trump was inaugurated in January and enacted a number of policies that are anathema to Mr. Friedman’s and Mr. Koch’s politics, most notably the sweeping tariffs.

Mr. Koch dispensed with the cheery rhetoric of most conservatives these days. Speaking about the subsidies and protectionism of the past, he said that “you can see why we’re in the mess we’re in today.” The billionaire often speaks about his core “principles” in business and philanthropy.

“With so much change, chaos and conflict, too many people and organizations are abandoning these principles,” Mr. Koch later said, not uttering Mr. Trump’s name. He added, “But we know from history, this just makes the problems worse. And people have forgotten that when principles are lost, so are freedoms.”

Mr. Koch’s political group announced a $20 million campaign this year to try to encourage the renewal of Mr. Trump’s 2017 tax cuts. But Mr. Koch has made no secret of his profound disagreements with the president. In 2024, the Koch network took a more muscular approach, but to no avail, endorsing Nikki Haley in her bid for the Republican nomination. “CHARLES KOCH AND HIS GROUP GOT PLAYED FOR SUCKERS RIGHT FROM THE BEGINNING!” Mr. Trump posted as Ms. Haley’s campaign sputtered.

Mr. Koch still has financial capital, even if not always political: A super PAC tied to Mr. Koch spent almost $180 million on the 2024 cycle, a sum that does not include spending by affiliated nonprofit groups. Mr. Koch has a net worth of $66 billion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, making him the 22nd wealthiest person in the world, just behind the family of Julia Flescher Koch, the widow of David Koch, who died in 2019. Mr. Koch’s firm, Koch Inc., is the second-largest privately owned company in the country (Cargill is No. 1).

Mr. Koch’s speech in a Washington ballroom made for his most prominent engagement since at least the pandemic. He has done a few podcasts and interviews as late as early 2022 to promote his 2020 book, but he has largely ceded the spotlight to his son, Chase Koch.

Sorry Mr. Koch but you helped put Trump where he is!

Tony

Pope Francis’s final act of kindness: donating his entire personal bank account to prisoners

Pope Francis in 2014. Photo by Jeffrey Bruno/ALETEIA ( CC BY-SA 2.0 )

Dear Commons Community,

Even in his final moments, Pope Francis maintained his heart for justice and mercy. 

As Catholics around the world mourn the death of the late pope, more details are surfacing about his final days.

Monsignor Benoni “Don Ben” Ambarus, who was the official responsible for managing Francis’ charity and prison pastoral care in Rome, said that before his death, the pope donated €200,000 (or about $226,400 USD) to a juvenile prison in Rome: Casal del Marmo.

It was the last of his personal wealth, and  it went to fund a pasta factory — Pastificio Futuro, or “Future Pasta Factory” — that operates in the prison.

“[Pope Francis] called for more to be done to restore dignity to the prisoners … But there was no direct result of his appeals. Like on the reduction of sentences,” Ambarus added.

“A great sadness enveloped the prisoners when they realised that the institutions had done nothing, not even a small gesture. Small gestures — a letter, a conversation, practical help with shoes or clothing — can reignite the human dignity that prison walls so often extinguish.”

But Pope Francis will be remembered far beyond a gesture. The pasta factory in Casal del Marmo received his blessing years ago, employing inmates to work toward reintegration in society and prevent recidivism.

“It all goes back to March 2013,” Alberto Mochi Onori told El Mundo, when the pope visited the prison for Holy Thursday for the first time.

“At the end of the visit, he delivered a brief homily, proclaiming: ‘Do not let yourselves be robbed of hope!’”

After a prison chaplain spoke with the Pontiff on this visit, Onori said Pope Francis declared: “We have to do something for these kids.” The pope later donated the initial funding to start the pasta factory.

Casal del Marmo held a particularly special place in the history of Pope Francis. In 2013, he celebrated his first Mass of the Lord’s Supper on Holy Thursday there. 

And in 2023, he returned to wash the feet of 12 young inmates.

It was a ritual that recalls the foot-washing Jesus performed on his 12 apostles at their Last Supper before his crucifixion. In this Holy Thursday moment, Pope Francis assured the youth of their dignity, adding that “any of us” can fall into sin.

Pope Francis’ commitment to people in poverty and prison was prominent throughout his papacy, demonstrating his belief that the Catholic Church should help and provide attention to people living on the margins of society.

“We have to help each other … giving one another a hand is beautiful,” Pope Francis said in his remarks at the feet-washing ritual in 2023.

“In society, we profit from each other … how many injustices [are there], how many people without work, without money to buy what they need? If that’s not me, it’s for the grace of God.”

Ambarus said that even in his tired and frail state, Pope Francis would be remembered as someone who fought for the rights of prisoners.

“He (fought for) them until his last breath,” Ambarus told La Repubblica. “That is why the prisoners saw hope in him. A father died for them.”

Tony

NSF director, Panch Panchanathan, resigns amid cuts to grants and staff reductions

 

Sethuraman “Panch” Panchanathan

Dear Commons Community,

Sethuraman “Panch” Panchanathan, the scientist  Donald Trump chose during his first term to lead the National Science Foundation (NSF) resigned last week after apparently being unable to stomach the massive changes Trump has imposed on the agency during the first 100 days of his second administration. As reported by Science.

“I believe that I have done all I can to advance the mission of the agency and feel that it is time to pass the baton to new leadership,” Panchanathan wrote on April 24th in  a letter to the staff. Panchanathan, a computer scientist whom the Senate confirmed to lead NSF in August 2020, leaves 16 months short of the end of the 6-year term.

“I cannot imagine how difficult it must have been trying to protect the NSF, its programs and staff, and the U.S. research community from White House directives and actions that are in conflict with NSF’s mission, decades of congressional appropriations, and the law,” says Rice University physicist Neal Lane, who led NSF under former President Bill Clinton.

Panchanathan didn’t give a reason for his sudden departure, but he could not have been happy with orders from the White House to accept what could be a 55% cut to the agency’s $9 billion budget next year and to draw up plans to halve its 1700-person staff. But his resignation letter was the first public indication of his unhappiness. “While NSF has always been an efficient agency,” he wrote, “we still took [on] the challenge of identifying other possible efficiencies and reducing our commitments to serve the scientific community even better.”

The last straw may have been a decision in mid-April by billionaire Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to terminate up to $2 billion in existing NSF grants. The list appears to have been drawn from a report last fall by Senator Ted Cruz (R–TX) identifying what he said were 3483 “woke science” grants NSF had made to increase diversity in science, foster environmental justice, and study the spread of misinformation on social media. As Science went to press, researchers had reported the termination of some 550 awards since the agency’s 18 April announcement it would begin to cancel grants.

Before leading NSF, Panchanathan had spent 20 years as a faculty member and then senior research administrator at Arizona State University. When nominated he was also serving on the National Science Board, NSF’s presidentially appointed oversight body. His achievements included creating NSF’s first new directorate in 30 years, for technology, innovation, and partnerships, and launching 10 regional “engines” that seek to spur economic development.

During his 5-year tenure, Panchanathan worked to build bipartisan ties to congressional leaders, who reciprocated in statements reacting to his resignation. ” thank Dr. Panchanathan for his vision, integrity, and unwavering commitment to U.S. scientific innovation,” said Representative Brian Babin (R–TX), who leads the science panel in the House of Representatives.

The top Democrat on the Senate panel that Cruz chairs praised Panchanathan but also pointed a partisan finger at the Trump administration. Its proposal to cut NSF’s budget represents “a deliberate dismemberment of America’s innovation engine by DOGE” and the head of the White House budget office, Russell Vought, said Senator Maria Cantwell (WA). “Don’t blame Panch for stepping down.”

Brian Stone, who joined NSF in 2000 as a facilities manager and has spent the past decade as chief of staff to the director, is now acting director.

What a tragic loss for science research!

Tony

Dick Barnett, champion with Knicks, dies at 88!

Dear Commons Community,

Dick Barnett, a basketball Hall of Famer who played on both New York Knicks NBA championship teams after being part of a historic college powerhouse at Tennessee A&I, has died. He was 88.

The Knicks announced the death of the former guard earlier this week.  

 Knicks said in a statement. “He left a positive impact on everyone he encountered and this organization is incredibly fortunate to have him be such an integral part of its history. His jersey will forever hang in the rafters of Madison Square Garden, and his play throughout his career will forever be a part of Knicks fans memories.”

Barnett played on the Knicks’ title teams in 1970 and 1973 and reached the Naismith Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame as both a player and as a member of his college teams at Tennessee A&I (later Tennessee State), the first HBCU to win a national championship in basketball.

On the Knicks, he was the quiet one, who contributed every game.  Around him were the “stars” including Willis Reed, Walt Frazier, Bill Bradley and Dave DeBusschere.  Walt Frazier, who has been announcing Knick games for decades, always praised Barnett for his on court play.   As reported by The Associated Press.  Frazier would also refer to Barnett as Dr. Dick because he had received a doctorate in education from Fordham University.

A native of Gary, Indiana, Barnett went on to star for the Tennessee A&I teams that made up one of college basketball’s first dynasties. The Tigers won three straight NAIA championships starting in 1957, with Barnett being chosen an All-American each season and twice being selected the MVP of the NAIA Tournament.

He was taken by the Syracuse Nationals with the No. 5 pick in the 1959 draft and also played for the Los Angeles Lakers before coming to the Knicks in 1965. He spent nine years with the Knicks, averaging 15.6 points and playing on their championship teams in 1970 and 1973.

Barnett is ninth on the Knicks’ career scoring list and his No. 12 jersey was retired in 1990.

Barnett led a long quest for recognition for his college team. The Tigers were eventually enshrined in the Hall of Fame in 2019, represented on stage by Barnett, and in 2024 visited the White House to meet with Vice President Kamala Harris.

Barnett, who was selected for one NBA All-Star Game, was inducted in the Hall of Fame as a player in 2024.

He was a class act.

May he rest in peace!

Tony

Chris Cillizza, Former CNN analyst, says media turned blind eye to Biden’s alleged decline!

Dear Commons Community,

Former CNN political analyst Chris Cillizza argued on Monday that journalists’ own unconscious biases stopped them from noticing then-President Joe Biden’s decline.

Cillizza released a video titled, “Why it *still* matters that the media missed the big Biden story,” where he reflected on how Axios’ Alex Thompson used his award speech at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner to “call out how both the Biden White House and the media mishandled President Biden’s cognitive decline during the 2024 election.” 

Had it been a Republican in office rather than Biden, he suggested, it may have been a very different story.

“They didn’t ask enough questions. Their skepticism meter was not honed—turned up high enough. And I think that had it been a Republican in that office, particularly if that Republican had been Donald Trump, there would have been less credulity. There would have been less willingness to just go along with what the Trump White House was saying like, ‘Oh he’s fine, you don’t see him in his great times He’s amazing.’”

He added, “I think there would have been more hard questions asked, and I think there should have been more hard questions asked by the media of Joe Biden and Joe Biden’s staff about his health. I absolutely think that’s true.”

I agree.  The media especially outlets like CNN and MSNBC took a pass on Biden’s mental decline and misled their viewers.

Tony

 

 

Tens of Thousands of Brits Sign Petition Demanding Trump Be Blocked from Addressing Parliament

 

Dear Commons Community,

Over forty-thousand British citizens have signed a petition demanding Donald Trump be blocked from addressing parliament during his upcoming state visit.

Trump has said he expects to visit the UK in September.  As reported by The National and other media.

Keir Starmer handed over an invitation letter from King Charles when he visited the White House in February.

A group of MPs and peers have already urged the Speakers of the House of Commons and House of Lords to turn down any request for Trump to address them while he is here.

It has now emerged that a petition on the change.org website echoing that demand has attracted 43,000 signatures in just one week.

The petition has been set up by philanthropist and campaigner Corin Dalby.

He said: “President Trump has shown a consistent disregard for democratic values.

“He has made troubling remarks about the UK and its institutions, and is unable to clearly condemn the Russian invasion of Ukraine – which all UK political parties have strongly opposed. 

“The UK parliament should not provide a platform to a figure whose actions and words are so at odds with the principles we hold dear.”

Dalby added: “We are a proud democratic country, and we should be protective of that status. Therefore, we should be extremely vigilant by not affording anyone, regardless of their position or status, and who do not align themselves, either verbally or by actions, with our own values with the privilege of addressing parliament.”

The last American president to address parliament was Barack Obama in 2011.

Former Commons Speaker John Bercow blocked Trump from doing so the last time he was president.

A spokesperson for current Speaker Lindsay Hoyle said: “Should a request be made to address the Houses of Parliament, it will be considered in the usual way. No request has been received, but any decision would be made by both speakers.”

Trump – the leader of the free world – HAH!

Tony

Conservative Rick Hess on “Trump’s 100 Days: The Good, the Bad, and the Confounding”

Photo courtesy of The Guardian.

Dear Commons Community,

Conservative Rick Hess , Director of Education Policy Studies at the American Enterprise Institute,  had an essay in yesterday’s Education Week chiming in on President Donald Trump’s first 100 days as have already felt like being “trapped inside a Russian novel—and we’re barely underway.”  Entitled, “Trump’s 100 Days: The Good, the Bad, and the Confounding,” here is his entire essay.

Here’s my take on what we’ve seen in K-12. Be forewarned, you’ll need to look elsewhere for a blistering denunciation or an exercise in cheerleading. That’s because I’m feeling pretty conflicted. On the one hand, I support Team Trump’s priorities and vision. On the other, I think responsible government is less a matter of what you intend to do than what you actually do. And, on that score, there’s much to give me pause.

Character is destiny, in Russian novels as in life, and what we’re seeing reflects Trump’s. But unlike Trump 1.0, when his staff often tempered his impulsiveness, bombast, and distaste for detail, we’re getting the Full Trump this go-round. I didn’t fully anticipate the resulting chaos. Much of what’s happened over the past three-plus months has startled me. It’s not the priorities that have surprised me: I anticipated the emphasis on diversity, equity, and inclusion; gender ideology; school choice; and reducing the federal footprint. But I’ve been taken aback by the number and sweep of executive orders, the blunderbuss posture, and just how indiscriminate DOGE proved to be.

What’s surprised me in particular? First, what we’ve seen has been far less deliberate than I’d expected, given the Trump team’s thick (metaphorical) playbook and deep bench of talent. Second, the prominence and relentless aggression of the DOGE chainsaw. Third, the taste for confrontation, even when it made it tougher to rack up wins. Fourth, the failure to coherently make the case for many of their more controversial actions.

Look, I thought DOGE had enormous potential. I’ve long argued that the U.S. Department of Education could be run far more efficiently and responsibly—as have others, like Mark Schneider, my AEI colleague and a former director of the Institute of Education Sciences (IES). The department suffered under a troubled culture and a padded payroll, and its contracts would benefit from a good scouring. Moreover, previous administrations have lacked the will (or even the desire) to tackle any of this. So I was inclined to give DOGE’s grip-it-and-rip-it tactics a chance. But I noted that success would depend on the coherence of what followed. What we got was a capriciousness and clumsiness that raised red flags. DOGE’s mission was to promote efficiency and ensure money is spent on the things that matter. Well, months after ED’s contracts were yanked and staff were first let go, it’s entirely unclear that this will produce a more effective agency—and not just a smaller one. There’s been a disconcerting lack of clarity about what’s being cut, the rationale for specific cuts, how much money is being saved, or how things will work going forward.

Take the National Assessment of Educational Progress. DOGE either ignored the secretary of education’s promise to preserve NAEP or didn’t realize that it was cutting NAEP-essential staff and contracts (similar lapses, of course, have been evident across a number of agencies). While the small NAEP unit attached to the National Assessment Governing Board was preserved, that team is charged with management, strategy, and communications. The staff members who actually coordinated and crunched the data for NAEP got wiped out, along with more than 90 percent of IES. As the administration scrambles to recover from this misstep, NAEP is getting put back together with bubble gum and duct tape, while chunks of it (including the U.S. history test) are jettisoned. I get less of an impression of streamlining than of DOGE just gutting everything in its path.

Trump’s executive order to dismantle the Department of Education is better understood as an emphatic memo asking the secretary of education to do what she was already doing (since abolishing the department or moving components to other agencies requires an act of Congress). That’s why many of us assumed the president would urge Congress to act and then focus on things he could control. Instead, the long-shot push to dismantle ED plays on, even as Team Trump reassures everyone that no spending cuts are coming to ED’s major programs like Title I, IDEA, or Pell Grants (though there’s been talk of moving IDEA, for instance, to the Department of Health and Human Services—a move that would require not-in-the-cards congressional approval). Trump’s budget proposal does call for zeroing out Head Start, though it’s unclear whether Congress will go along. Moreover, the push to shrink Washington’s role sits uneasily alongside the new executive order on artificial intelligence, which calls for Uncle Sam to actively promote AI integration in schools.

Then there’s DEI. Obviously, those who support DEI hate everything Trump has done on this count. If you’re like me, though, you think the administration has a compelling case. Federal civil rights law requires schools and colleges to abide by the Civil Rights Act’s prohibition on discrimination based on race, color, or national origin. It seems obvious that when school officials are organizing race-based affinity groups or restricting programs based on student race or ethnicity, they are violating federal law—and creating a “hostile learning environment” for some students. Moreover, since 2021, four years of state-level legislative and legal efforts have offered up lessons about how to craft directives and legislation that are broadly popular and take First Amendment concerns seriously. I expected the administration’s ability to draw on those experiences would be an enormous boon.

Well, that hard-earned wisdom sure seems to have fallen by the wayside. The administration’s executive order and “Dear Colleague Letter” on DEI did little to distinguish between discriminatory conduct by schools, on one hand, and classroom instruction or materials that touched on matters of race, on the other. The federal government has both a right and an obligation to tackle the first. But not only is ED statutorily barred from interfering in matters of curriculum and instruction, the sense that it wants to raises First Amendment concerns—and reframes its efforts not as a response to DEI excess but a worrisome exercise in illiberalism. That’s made it easy for blue state chiefs to reject the administration’s DEI directive while credibly arguing that they’re not “pro-DEI” (unpopular) but “pro-First Amendment” (very popular). It’s also given Trump’s opponents a strong legal hand, as seen last week when three different federal judges ruled that the DEI directive doesn’t pass legal muster.

The same kind of good, bad, and confounding analysis applies to much of Trump’s agenda. On gender identity, his EO clarifying that Title IX’s use of sex means “biological sex” was necessary and appropriate. After all, the Biden administration sought to unilaterally rewrite Title IX to include gender identity and then force schools to overhaul policies governing locker rooms, dormitories, and more. Trump’s EO was a much-needed reaffirmation of what the law actually says. The issue is with how Team Trump has followed up. Trump personally confronted the governor of Maine over its transgender sports policy, threatening to strip federal K-12 funds—and then rapidly did so. If it were to stand, this would be a stunning expansion of presidential authority in education. But it’s not likely to stand. Republican attorneys general successfully challenged Biden’s Title IX guidance, and Maine will likely prevail, too. Meanwhile, Trump’s move to strip vast sums based on an executive order is a lousy precedent, an odd move for a president who talks of empowering states and a tactic that invites backlash against an otherwise popular policy.

On school choice, there’s been a genial executive order, ED has (thankfully) dropped the poison pill regulations that the Biden administration imposed on the charter school program, and the department has invited states to apply for waivers and is looking to make programs more choice-friendly. Congress may adopt a groundbreaking tax credit for scholarship programs in this year’s budget reconciliation bill. But the reality is that choice is mostly a state issue. The Every Student Succeeds Act already grants states enormous flexibility that they’re not using, and empowering states is less about rhetoric than about changing laws or overhauling regulations. Thus far, as best I can tell, there’s been little obvious activity on tackling rules and regulations.

Like I said up top, I’m conflicted. I’ve been impressed by the willingness to mount fights that are overdue, necessary, and challenging. But I can’t look past the disorder, opacity, and disregard for established law. Doing so much via executive action is a horrific norm that serves no one well. These proclamations can be reversed on day one by the next president. Conservatives were rightly livid when Biden’s White House operated this way, and ratcheting things up will eventually come back to haunt Republicans.

As we hit the 100-day mark, there’s still much time to course-correct. I’m rooting for a recalibration, for some sensible restraint and respect for due process. Trump has altered course on priorities like tariffs and student visas; next to that, bringing more discipline to the education agenda is an easy lift. And it certainly appears that DOGE’s role in education is waning. Elon Musk is mostly out, and DOGE has already cut all it readily can. Meanwhile, veteran K-12 state chiefs Penny Schwinn and Kirsten Baesler will be stepping into senior roles soon, if confirmed by the Senate. What we’ve seen thus far could be a product of who’s been at the table, so these shifts could yield something of a reset.

Team Trump risks taking issues where they entered with broad-based public support and turning them into political losers. Now, some in the administration believe that, if they only move fast and forcefully enough, they’ll be able to drive lasting cultural changes. Some deem education such a captive of the left that there’s no real price to be paid for breakage—that there’ll be no blowback. But that’s a dicey bet.

The past decade has shown that over-the-top tactics may serve mostly to alienate normies and energize the opposition. The way to make lasting change is by enacting legislation. Republicans entered 2025 with public support on much of this and control the House and the Senate, yet Congress has mostly been on the sidelines. Meanwhile, Trump is bleeding support. During Biden’s first two years, Democrats could have legislated on student loans or amended Title IX to reflect gender. They didn’t even try, instead they left it to dubious White House freelancing. That proved to be bad politics and a recipe for reversal. I suspect the same will prove true here.

It was Vice President J.D. Vance who said in 2022 while running for the Senate, “We’re going to have to get pretty wild, and pretty far out there, and go in directions that a lot of conservatives right now are uncomfortable with.” Well, so far, Trump 2.0 has delivered on that promise. But plunging presidential popularity, internal discord, and market gyrations are creating fierce headwinds. We’re 100 days in, with 1,361 left to go, and I can’t yet say whether what we’ve seen thus far is a prologue or a plot device. I suppose this is what it feels like to be a character in a Russian novel.

Also, in keeping with the Russian novel metaphor, Trump has convinced himself that his delusions are reality!

Tony

New York Governor Hochul and Legislature Pass New State Budget!

NY Governor Kathy Hochul Announcing Budget Agreement

Dear Commons Community,

New York Governor Kathy Hochul announced yesterday that a new state budget agreement has been passed by the Legislature.  Key elements of the budget bill include:

  • Cuts taxes for 8.3 million middle-class New Yorkers, bringing tax rates to their lowest levels in 70 years.
  • Makes breakfast and lunch free for every New York student.
  • Removes dangerous criminals from our streets and helps victims get the justice they deserve by making common-sense changes to our discovery laws.
  • Makes our streets and subways safer with record investments in gun violence prevention and action to connect people in the throes of severe mental illness with the life-saving care they need.
  • Tackles the housing crisis by standing up to big corporations that are making it harder for everyday New Yorkers to buy a home.
  • Removes distractions from students at school with a bell-to-bell restriction on smartphones — so kids can focus on learning.
  • Gives every New Yorker the opportunity to succeed by making community college FREE for adults pursuing careers in high-demand fields.

For education, the last two bulleted items are worth noting.

In a letter to supporters, Governor Hochul stated:

“While Washington remains distracted by chaos and division, New York is proving that government can get things done and make a real, positive difference in the lives of our families.”

Congratulations to the Governor and the Legislature!

Tony

Another Ronald H. Balson Novel: “Karolina’s Twins”

Dear Commons Community,

While on vacation last week, I read a fourth novel by Ronald H. Balson entitled, Karolina’s Twins, written in 2016.  Balson follows his winning formula that captivates the reader and uses a modern day investigation to unravel a mystery that took place during the 1930s and 1940s in Europe.  This story is based in Poland and focuses on the life of an 89-year old woman (Lena Woodward) who made a promise to her best friend, Karolina, seventy years ago when both were trying to escape capture by Nazi agents. Lena’s modern-day attorney, Catherine Lockhart,  and private investigator husband, Liam Taggart, are hired to find out what happened to Karolina’s twin daughters.  As with his other novels (The Girl from Berlin, Once We Were Brothers, and A Place to Hide), Balson does not disappoint his readers as Lockhart and Taggart unlock Woodward’s secrets.

If you are a mystery fan and at all interested in the Holocaust, I highly recommend Karolina’s Twins.

Below is a review and summary that appeared in The Jewish Book Council.

Tony

———————

The Jewish Book Council
Fic­tion
Karoli­na’s Twins
by Ronald H. Balson
Review by
Reni­ta Last

May 3, 2016

Ronald H. Bal­son has anoth­er Holo­caust sto­ry to tell, and he tells it well.

Karolina’s Twins chron­i­cles the jour­ney of a young Jew­ish Pol­ish school­girl who becomes a Holo­caust sur­vivor wracked with regret, but also with much resolve. Lena Wood­ward is on a mis­sion she has let lapse for 70 years. She must find her best friend’s aban­doned twin daugh­ters and is now deter­mined to return to Poland to keep her sacred promise to her dead friend.

Lena and Karoli­na grow up inno­cent­ly in Chrzanow, Poland, but their lives change when Ger­many invades. The teenagers, their fam­i­lies tak­en away, must now live by their wits to sur­vive bru­tal fac­to­ry labor, the ghet­to, and the occu­pa­tion. Karoli­na finds love, solace, and food with a Ger­man sol­dier while Lena is watched after by the fac­to­ry over­seer and a sym­pa­thet­ic Nazi offi­cer. Their tenac­i­ty, brav­ery, and skills keep them alive. Lena dis­plays a reser­voir of courage as she helps her friend care for her babies, risks her life for the Resis­tance, and dar­ing­ly attempts escapes to sur­vive each day. The friend­ship and faith­ful­ness, suf­fer­ing, and love Lena and Karoli­na expe­ri­ence haunt Lena as she lives out her life in Chicago.

Par­al­lel­ing Lena’s account is the con­tin­u­ing sto­ry and return of the team of Attor­ney Cather­ine Lock­hart and pri­vate inves­ti­ga­tor Liam Tag­gart, core char­ac­ters of Balson’s pre­vi­ous nov­els. Cather­ine and Liam are now in a new phase of their rela­tion­ship, liv­ing togeth­er and expect­ing a child.

While Lena’s retelling of her sto­ry is the main focus of the book, Cat must also deal with Lena’s bel­liger­ent son, Arthur. He feels his aged moth­er is suf­fer­ing from demen­tia and is obsessed with find­ing twins he nev­er heard about, inves­ti­gat­ing and cor­rob­o­rat­ing Lena’s mem­o­ries that con­stant­ly tug and nag at Cather­ine as not being com­plete or entire­ly open.

So much of the struc­ture of the book is Lena relat­ing her nar­ra­tive to Cat and plot dri­ven that all the char­ac­ters are not fleshed out or devel­oped ful­ly, but Lena’s WWII expe­ri­ences and the present-day Chica­go sto­ry­lines keep the sto­ry mov­ing quick­ly and build sus­pense and inter­est: the need to know about the twins, the hor­rif­ic cir­cum­stances, the his­to­ry, and Lena’s per­son­al tor­ment com­pel the read­er to turn page after page to learn the final outcome.

Bal­son has loose­ly based the sto­ry of Lena Schein­man Wood­ward on the life of a Holo­caust sur­vivor he met while on tour for Once We Were Broth­ers. In his Acknowl­edge­ments, the author dis­cuss­es the exten­sive research involved for this nov­el. Bal­son had vis­it­ed the small towns and larg­er cities of Poland as well as Auschwitz-Birke­nau, muse­ums and libraries, and exten­sive­ly stud­ied his­tor­i­cal doc­u­ments. He relates an abun­dance of facts and infor­ma­tion through Lena’s nar­ra­tive; most com­pelling are the first­hand accounts of how the Nazis took over each town, installed cur­fews and life-chang­ing restric­tions, blacked out news, and sep­a­rat­ed the Jews from the gen­er­al pop­u­lace. The dis­ease, hunger, lack of space, and hope­less­ness of ghet­to life as well as the forced slave labor, liq­ui­da­tion of the ghet­tos, Juden­rats, death march­es, and con­cen­tra­tion camp exis­tence are ren­dered and har­row­ing­ly absorbed into Lena’s and Karolina’s story.

Cen­tral to Karolina’s Twins are the ques­tions of what sur­vivors can share, what they will talk about, how they remem­ber, and com­ing to terms with their mem­o­ries and their own sur­vival. Lena must face deeply guard­ed secrets she had locked away for 70 years and also deal with the real­i­ty of today. Bal­son has cre­at­ed a state­ly, proud, accom­plished, and humane hero­ine to tell his story.

Liberal Mark Carney Wins Canada Election – Major Rebuke of Trump!

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney speaking to supporters.   (Justin Tang//The Canadian Press via AP)

Dear Commons Community,

Prime Minister Mark Carney’s Liberal Party won Canada’s federal election yesterday, capping a stunning turnaround in fortunes fueled by U.S. President Donald Trump’s annexation threats and trade war.

After polls closed, the Liberals were projected to win more of Parliament’s 343 seats than the Conservatives. It wasn’t immediately clear, though, if they would win an outright majority — at least 172 — or would need to rely on one of the smaller parties to pass legislation.  As reported by The Associated Press.

The Liberals looked headed for a crushing defeat until Trump started attacking Canada’s economy and threatening its sovereignty, suggesting it should become the 51st state. Trump’s actions infuriated Canadians and stoked a surge in nationalism that helped the Liberals flip the election narrative and win a fourth-straight term in power.

In a victory speech before supporters in Ottawa, Carney stressed the importance of Canadian unity in the face of Washington’s threats. He also said the mutually beneficial system Canada and the U.S. had shared since World War II had ended.

“We are over the shock of the American betrayal, but we should never forget the lessons,” he said.

“As I’ve been warning for months, America wants our land, our resources, our water, our country,” Carney said. “These are not idle threats. President Trump is trying to break us so America can own us. That will never … ever happen. But we also must recognize the reality that our world has fundamentally changed.”

A defeat for the Conservatives

The Conservative Party’s leader, Pierre Poilievre, hoped to make the election a referendum on former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, whose popularity declined toward the end of his decade in power as food and housing prices rose.

But Trump attacked, Trudeau resigned and Carney, a two-time central banker, became the Liberal Party’s leader and prime minister.

In a concession speech and with his own House of Commons seat still in doubt, Poilievre vowed to keep fighting for Canadians.

“We are cognizant of the fact that we didn’t get over the finish line yet,” Poilievre told supporters in Ottawa. “We know that change is needed, but change is hard to come by. It takes time. It takes work. And that’s why we have to learn the lessons of tonight — so that we can have an even better result the next time Canadians decide the future of the country.”

Even with Canadians grappling with the fallout from a deadly weekend attack at a Vancouver street festival, Trump was trolling them on election day, suggesting again on social media that Canada should become the 51st state and saying he was on their ballot. He also erroneously claimed that the U.S. subsidizes Canada, writing, “It makes no sense unless Canada is a State!”

Trump’s truculence has infuriated Canadians, leading many to cancel U.S. vacations, refuse to buy American goods and possibly even vote early. A record 7.3 million Canadians cast ballots before election day.

As Poilievre and his wife cast their ballots in Ottawa, he implored voters to “Get out to vote — for a change.” After running a Trump-lite campaign for weeks, though, the Conservative leader’s similarities to the bombastic American might have cost him.

Reid Warren, a Toronto resident, said he voted Liberal because Poilievre “sounds like mini-Trump to me.” And he said Trump’s tariffs are a worry.

“Canadians coming together from, you know, all the shade being thrown from the States is great, but it’s definitely created some turmoil, that’s for sure,” he said.

Historian Robert Bothwell said Poilievre appealed to the “same sense of grievance” as Trump, but that it ultimately worked against him.

“The Liberals ought to pay him,” Bothwell said, referring to the U.S. president. “Trump talking is not good for the Conservatives.”

The Liberal way forward

Carney and the Liberals secured a new term, but they have daunting challenges ahead.

If they don’t win a majority in Parliament, the Liberals might need rely on one of the smaller parties to remain in power and pass legislation. The Bloc Québécois, which looked set to finish third, is a separatist party from French-speaking Quebec that seeks independence from Canada. Trudeau’s Liberals relied on the New Democrats to remain in power for four years, but the progressive party faired poorly on Monday and its leader, Jagmeet Singh, said he was stepping down after eight years in charge.

“This is a dramatic comeback, but if the Liberals cannot win a majority of seats, political uncertainty in a new minority Parliament could complicate things for them,” said McGill University political science professor Daniel Béland.

Until this year, foreign policy hadn’t dominated a Canadian election this much since 1988, when, ironically, free trade with the United States was the prevailing issue.

In addition to the trade war with the U.S. and frosty relationship with Trump, Canada is dealing with a cost-of-living crisis. And more than 75% of its exports go to the U.S., so Trump’s tariffs threat and his desire to get North American automakers to move Canada’s production south could severely damage the Canadian economy.

While campaigning, Carney vowed that every dollar the the government collects from counter-tariffs on U.S. goods will go toward Canadian workers who are adversely affected by the trade war. He also said he plans to keep dental care in place, offer a middle-class tax cut, return immigration to sustainable levels and increase funding to Canada’s public broadcaster, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation.

Congratulations Prime Minister Carney!

Tony