Albert Einstein College of Medicine (Bronx, NY) eliminates tuition after $1 billion gift!

Dr. Ruth Gottesman

Dear Commons Community,

Albert Einstein College of Medicine will offer students free tuition following a $1 billion donation from Dr. Ruth Gottesman, the 93-year-old widow of a major Wall Street investor.  Dr Gottesman is also a former professor at the Bronx school.

It is one of the largest ever donations made to a US school and is the largest ever made to a medical school.

The Bronx, New York City’s poorest borough, is ranked as the unhealthiest of New York state’s 62 counties.

In a statement, university dean Dr Yaron Yomer said that the “transformational” gift “radically revolutionises our ability to continue attracting students who are committed to our mission, not just those who can afford it”.

Tuition at the school is nearly $59,000 each year, leaving students with substantial debt.

The statement from Einstein noted students in their final year will be reimbursed for their spring 2024 tuition, and from August, all students, including those who are currently enrolled, will receive free tuition.

The donation “will free up and lift our students, enabling them to pursue projects and ideas that might otherwise be prohibitive”, Dr Yomer added.

Dr Gottesman, now 93, began working at the school in 1968. She studied learning disabilities, ran literacy programs and developed widely used screening and evaluation protocols.

Her late husband, David “Sandy” Gottesman, founded a prominent investment house and was an early investor in Berkshire Hathaway, Warren Buffet’s multinational conglomerate. He died in September 2022 at the age of 96.

Dr. Gottesman said in a statement that the doctors who train at Einstein go on to “provide the finest healthcare to communities here in the Bronx and all over the world”.

“I am very thankful to my late husband, Sandy, for leaving these funds in my care, and l feel blessed to be given the great privilege of making this gift to such a worthy cause,” she added.

About 50% of Einstein’s first-year students are from New York, and approximately 60% are women. Statistics published by the school show that about 48% of its medical students are white, while 29% are Asian, 11% are Hispanic and 5% are black.

In an interview with The New York Times, she recalled that her late husband had left her a “whole portfolio of Berkshire Hathaway stock” when he died with the instructions to “do whatever you think is right with it”.

“I wanted to fund students at Einstein so that they would receive free tuition,” Dr. Gottesman said she immediately realized. “There was enough money to do that in perpetuity.”

She added that she occasionally wonders what her husband would have thought of the donation.

“I hope he’s smiling and not frowning,” she said. “He gave me the opportunity to do this, and I think he would be happy – I hope so.”

God bless her!

Tony

 

Fox News’ Neil Cavuto cuts into footage of Trump’s speech in South Carolina to point out lies – See Video!

Neil Cavuto Donald Trump  (Fox News/Getty Images/Salon)

Dear Commons Community,

During a broadcast of Donald Trump’s speech at a “Get Out the Vote” rally in Rock Hill, South Carolina on Friday evening, Fox News host Neil Cavuto cut into the footage to point out inaccuracies in what was being said by the former president (see video clip below.)

As reported by Salon and other media outlets.

Taking issue with Trump claiming credit for the market going up while, in the same breath, blaming Biden for inflated gas prices and whatever else, Cavuto said, “We’ll continue monitoring the president’s remarks and I mean no offense to him or some of you who might want to continue to hear him, but I did have to say that even though the former president is entitled to his opinions, he’s not entitled to his own set of facts.”

Making mention of the fact that the market is indeed going up, but that it has nothing to do with Trump, Cavuto went on to shoot down his claim that gas prices are at $6 a gallon, sourcing the real price as being an average of $3.26 a gallon.

Ending on Trump’s usual song and dance about the 2020 election being stolen from him, Cavuto reminded viewers that the issue has been investigated by everyone and their uncle, even by some judges appointed by Trump himself, and that there’s been no evidence found to back his claim on that.

Cavuto is one of the few good guys still left at Fox News.

Tony

 

 

Carnegie Mellon Students Create Generative AI App for Policy Analysts!

Dear Commons Community.

A team of graduate students at Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) recently developed a generative AI tool to help policy analysts and researchers quickly find information within large documents and data sets.   The tool, dubbed “GovScan,” allows policy analysts to scan large documents and data sets to research and find relevant information for policy proposals, cutting the hours-long process down to a matter of seconds.  As reported by government technology.

According to CMU professor Chris Goranson, faculty lead for the project, the tool was developed by students in his Policy Innovation Lab class, a seven-week course where students are encouraged to come up with tech solutions to challenges encountered in government or government-related jobs. He said the tool, dubbed “GovScan,” was developed by Davis Craig and Tyler Faris, students in CMU’s Master of Science in Public Policy and Management program, along with Aakash Dolas and Eashwari Samant, who are in the Master of Integrated Innovation for Products and Services program.

Goranson said the tool can help public servants comb through PDF reports for relevant information needed for things like policy and funding proposals. Noting that policy analysts can typically spend three to four hours looking for data points within relevant reports, he said the platform uses large language modeling to find information in a matter of a few seconds.

“The basic idea was just to improve the usability of government reports,” he said. “That was the idea, was [seeing if] students could come up with a creative solution that would allow people to more efficiently search lots of information spread across lots and lots of different documents.”

Craig said the LLM tool utilizes a keyword search and a “semantic search,” which uses a technique called “vector embeddings” to determine the meaning of a question and scan indexed reports to find relevant ones, as well as data points within reports that are most applicable to a given project. The tool is then able to summarize results and provide citations for the information. Craig likened the tool to “the ‘Control-F’ search function on steroids.”

“We’ve been working on getting it more and more precise so we can be able to find more and more specific pieces of information,” he said. “That’s something that we’re continually working on.”

According to a news release emailed to Government Technology, the idea came after students made note of the challenges faced by analysts and researchers like Maya Mechenbier, a project lead for the U.S. Digital Service. In one scenario, students connected with government workers who’d been tasked with reviewing reports on child-care funding in 50 states, with each report containing hundreds of pages. In cases such as these, the release said, policy analysts need to be able to find particular data points within reports to analyze and compare the effectiveness of programs, which can be difficult for analysts to absorb due to the magnitude and variation of the information.

“Whether it’s for Medicaid or the Child Care Development Fund (CCDF) subsidy dollars, states’ plans are typically stored and made public in a PDF form,” Mechenbier said. “Fifty states might do 50 different things with their programs.”

According to the news release, the team has made their work available via a GitHub repository under an open-source license as they work to develop the platform further. The team noted that the application still needs additional testing but hopes the tool will be useful for research officers and policy analysts to do their jobs more effectively.

“It seems simple on the surface, but I think it could be a real game changer in terms of actually allowing people to be much more efficient at researching data,” Goranson said. “The way that usually happens is we just spend hours and hours and hours parsing through it, or maybe we try that with some [other] existing tool, but I think what the students created was something that really leveraged cutting-edge technologies to approach the problem slightly differently.”

I visited the site and it is a simple but  interesting AI application.  What is important is that it is an example of students using and integrating AI into their studies.  We are and will continue to see more and more of this.

Tony

 

Asa Hutchinson says Trump wants to wrap up nomination soon ‘because he knows the storm clouds are gathering over him’

Asa Hutchinson

Dear Commons Community,

Former Arkansas Governor Asa Hutchinson (R) said yesterday he thinks former President Trump wants to wrap up the nominating process quickly because he sees certain warning signs looming that could threaten his path to the candidacy.

In an interview with MSNBC’s Jonathan Capehart, Hutchinson mentioned as potential threats the multiple court cases against him, the financial fines and fees he must pay, and the nearly 40 percent of South Carolina GOP voters who voted for Haley over Trump.

“I think what Donald Trump is trying to do is to wrap this nomination up very quickly because he knows the storm clouds are gathering over him with the multiple court cases, with the financial judgments against him, and with 40 percent of the Republican base saying we want an alternative,” Hutchinson said.

Hutchinson, who suspended his own campaign for president last month and endorsed Haley, pointed to the party convention as an opportunity to emerge with a different candidate.

Asked whether he would support Trump if Haley dropped out of the race, Hutchinson said, “Well, I’m not going to support a convicted felon.”

“And of course that remains to be seen. So let’s see who comes out of the Republican convention. It’s not done until it’s done,” Hutchinson responded, adding later, “Let’s wait and see who comes out of the convention. I’m not going to support a convicted felon.”

Hutchinson did not say whether he would support Trump as the ultimate nominee, if the former president is not ultimately convicted in any of his four criminal indictments that he faces – two on the federal level and two on the state level.

Hutchinson said that decision is difficult, as a longtime Republican who still believes in the party.

“I’ve always supported the Republican nominee. It’s sort of a big deal to move a different direction. And I have still hope for the Republican Party,” Hutchinson said. “It’s challenged because I see the direction and the challenge that Nikki Haley has in front of her, but we’re going to work hard to see if we can change them between now and the convention.”

I saw the interview with Hutchinson yesterday.  He is one of the good guys in the Republican Party and knows it well!

Tony

Charles Koch network says it will stop funding Nikki Haley’s presidential bid!

Dear Commons Community,

The political network, Americans for Prosperity Action (AFP), financed largely by billionaire Charles Koch announced yesterday that it will no longer spend funds to support Nikki Haley’s presidential bid.

In an email obtained by NBC News, which was confirmed by two sources who received it, the network’s advocacy arm said that following Haley’s loss in South Carolina, the group no longer believes it can make a meaningful difference for her in the race, senior adviser Emily Seidel said. Instead, AFP will focus its resources down the ballot on House and Senate races.

“She has made it clear that she will continue to fight and we wholeheartedly support her in this effort,” Seidel said. “But given the challenges in the primary states ahead, we don’t believe any outside group can make a material difference to widen her path to victory.”

Politico first reported the decision.  

The move is a blow to Haley as she vows to continue against Trump, who beat her by about 20 percentage points Saturday and captured all but three delegates.

AFP provided crucial support to Haley on the ground, mobilizing its vast network of grassroots political activists to help get the vote out for her in early states. The group also poured money into advertising, hoping to fuel her rise. AFP Action, a super PAC, spent more than $31 million boosting Haley in the race, according to Federal Election Commission data.

Donors to Americans for Prosperity, which is part of the political arm of the larger Koch network and is led by Seidel, had pressed the group to endorse a Republican primary candidate in the race to find an alternative to Trump.

When the group endorsed Haley in November, Seidel said AFP Action was looking for the best Republican “to turn the page on the current political era.” She said that candidate was Haley, with the group “better equipped to help her do it” than any other organization.

Even so, many longtime Koch-world operatives questioned the decision, seeing little chance for her to win the nomination.

Haley’s pathway has now all but closed, with Trump appearing to be cruising toward his party’s presidential nomination.

Haley has said she does not think Trump can defeat President Joe Biden.

Sounding a resolute note Sunday, Haley’s campaign touted new fundraising numbers to fuel the fight ahead.

“AFP is a great organization and ally in the fight for freedom and conservative government. We thank them for their tremendous help in this race,” Haley’s campaign said. “Our fight continues, and with more than $1 million coming in from grassroots conservatives in just the last 24 hours, we have plenty of fuel to keep going.”

Haley’s team added, “We have a country to save.”

In a post on Truth Social, Trump said the Koch network had been “played for suckers right from the beginning.”

The announcement Sunday was a disappointing end for AFP’s strategy after it promised a year ago to reverse American politics’ “downward spiral” by backing a Trump alternative.

On Sunday, Seidel wrote that AFP knew from the start that the path “faced the longest odds” but that given the stakes, it “couldn’t sit on the sidelines.”

“This organization exists to do hard things,” she said.

The enthusiasm felt through the start of the year and into New Hampshire appeared to slip as Trump’s grip on the race became harder to ignore.

Asked about AFP Action’s decision, a source briefed on the decision said that after the New Hampshire primary, “they’d already made a commitment on January 8 with the TV buys. And there was hope, realistic hope, that things would change.”

That notion began to fade when the surge never materialized.

“There was an honest objective belief that her campaign was still surging, especially when Donald Trump reacted the way he did towards her doing so well and not dropping out,” the source said. “That hope did not come to fruition.”

The big question now for the AFP is whether it will support Trump?

Tony

Trump Endorses Joe Biden for President!

Photo:  CPAC

Dear Commons Community,

Donald Trump appeared to say that Joe Biden should be president during a speech at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) 2024.  During his speech, Trump repeated claims that he had a good personal relationship with Russian leader Vladimir Putin, saying they “got along well” during his term as president. “He [Putin]  did announce the other day that he’d much rather see Biden as president, and I agree with him” said Trump. It is not clear whether he misspoke, as he went on to make his usual attacks on Joe Biden calling him ‘Crooked Joe’ and accusing the president of being mentally impaired, during the speech on 24 February 2024.

Tony

Scientists Build a Time Crystal that Lasted for 40 Minutes. A “first!”

A Time Crystal Lasted for 40 Minutes.  Credit:  Alex Greilich/TU Dortmund

Dear Commons Community,

Time crystals are one of the most mind-bending concepts in modern physics.  They are bizarre creations of science, first conceptualized in 2012 and first created several years after. They’re a whole new phase of matter made from quantum particles, each of which has what’s called a spin direction. The particles are excited into an energetic state—where they get stuck—and hit with a laser, which starts the process of these particles’ spin directions flipping back and forth.

It’s all very complicated, but here’s the kicker: this never-ending spin-flipping burns no energy. It completely violates the first and second laws of thermodynamics—you get never-ending change for no energy while also not dissolving into chaos. That shouldn’t be possible, so they shouldn’t exist. But they do. It’s one of many places where classical physics falls short of explaining the quantum realm.

While the atoms of normal, everyday crystals are arranged in a repeating pattern in space, time crystals are additionally arranged in a repeating pattern in time—essentially, they are crystals existing in a dimension beyond our typical 3D perception. “It’s a way to kind of have your cake and eat it too” said U.S. Nobel laureate Frank Wilczek, who first conceived of time crystals in 2012.  As reported by Popular Mechanics.

Time crystals are created similar to how many things are created in advanced physics—through the use of super-cooled atoms (i.e. a Bose-Einstein condensates) and lasers. Although this fascinating new phase of matter could have game-changing applications in the world of quantum computing, they don’t tend to survive very long. In 2022, for example, scientists from Universität Hamburg observed a continuous time crystal, but it only lasted for a few milliseconds.

Now, researchers from TU Dortmund University in Germany have created a continuous time crystal that lasted 10 million times longer, at around 40 minutes. To use Wilczek’s own words—that’s a lot of cake.

To create this time crystal, TU Dortmund physicist Alex Greilich and his team created a crystal of indium gallium arsenide doped with silicon (a.k.a. a semiconductor). In this crystal, the nuclear spins “act as a reservoir for the time crystal,” according to the university press statement. Once cooled to 6 Kelvin and shot with a laser, a nuclear spin forms as a result of the laser’s interaction with loosely-held electrons.

Then, the polarization of the nuclear spin creates oscillations resembling a time crystal. And amazingly, this repeating oscillation lasted a whole 40 minutes—an order of magnitude far greater than any continuous time crystal that’s come before. The results of this study were published in late January in the journal Nature.

While 40 minutes is quite the achievement, it could also only be the beginning of how long these kinds of time crystals can exist. According to ScienceAlert, this crystal showed no signs of decay in 40 minutes, implying that future time crystals could last for hours, or even longer.

This is all well and good, but… what would we even use these time crystals for? Previous work has suggested that time crystals could find applications in the world of quantum computing, where linked time crystals act as qubits. But as with many amazing breakthroughs and discoveries, scientists don’t really know what uses could be dreamed up in the future.

Tony

Analyzing Donald Trump’s Victory in South Carolina Republican Primary!

Courtesy of The New York Times

Dear Commons Community,

Donald Trump won over South Carolina Republicans as the candidate who voters believe can win in November, keep the country safe, and has the mental capability to be president according to the Associated Press VoteCast data (see Note below).

Trump cruised to victory in the South Carolina primary with the support of an almost unwavering base of loyal voters. AP VoteCast found that Republicans in the state are broadly aligned with Trumps’s goals: Many question the value of supporting Ukraine’s fight against Russia; and overwhelming majorities see immigrants as hurting the U.S. and suspect that there are nefarious political motives behind Trump’s multiple criminal indictments.

Even in her home state of South Carolina, where she was once governor, Nikki Haley appeared to have little chance against Trump. Just over half of GOP voters had a favorable view of her, whereas about two-thirds had a positive view of Trump.

About 6 in 10 South Carolina voters consider themselves supporters of the “Make America Great Again” movement, a Trump slogan that helped catapult him to the White House in 2016. About 9 in 10 Trump voters said they were driven by their support for him, not by objections to his opponent. Haley’s voters were much more divided: About half were motivated by supporting her, but nearly as many turned out to oppose Trump.

HOW TRUMP WON IN SOUTH CAROLINA

Trump’s victory in South Carolina looked remarkably similar to his wins in the Iowa caucuses and the New Hampshire primary. It’s a sign that regional differences that once existed within the GOP have been supplanted by a national movement that largely revolves around the former president.

Trump, 77, won in South Carolina with voters who are white and do not have a college degree, one of his core constituencies. About two-thirds of Trump’s backers in this election fell into that group.

A majority believe Trump is a candidate who can emerge victorious in November’s general election, while only about half say the same of Haley. Voters were also far more likely to view Trump than Haley as someone who would “stand up and fight for people like you” and to say he would keep the country safe. And about 7 in 10 say he has the mental capability to serve effectively as president.

Trump’s voters also backed his more nationalist views — they are more likely than Haley’s supporters to have lukewarm views of the NATO alliance or even consider it bad for the U.S., to say immigrants are hurting the country and to say immigration is the top issue facing the country.

NIKKI HALEY’S POLITICAL FUTURE

At the age of 52, Haley has bet that she can offer a generational change for the GOP. But the future she articulated has little basis in the present-day GOP, even in South Carolina, where she previously won two terms as governor. About 4 in 10 of South Carolina Republicans — including about 6 in 10 of those supporting Trump — say they have an unfavorable opinion of her.

Haley has said she will stay in the race until at least the Super Tuesday primaries, though so far there are no signs that she has disrupted Trump’s momentum. She’s struggled to convince the core of the Republican Party that she’s a better choice than the former president — losing most conservatives and those without a college degree to Trump.

Who is her coalition? Haley dominated among South Carolina voters who said that Democrat Joe Biden won the 2020 presidential election. Roughly three-quarters of her supporters say Biden was legitimately elected president in 2020, and about 4 in 10 voted for Biden in that election. Her problem is that about 6 in 10 Republican primary voters say they believed Biden was not legitimately elected.

TRUMP’S POTENTIAL WEAKNESSES IN A GENERAL ELECTION

Trump has an iron grip on the Republican base, but that might not be enough of a coalition to guarantee a win in November’s general election.

South Carolina was a chance to show that he can expand his coalition beyond voters who are white, older and without a college degree. But about 9 in 10 of South Carolina’s primary voters were white, making it hard to see if Trump has made inroads with Black voters whom he has attempted to win over.

Haley outpaced Trump among college-educated voters, a relative weakness for him that could matter in November as people with college degrees are a growing share of the overall electorate. Even though South Carolina Republican voters believe that Trump can win in November, some had worries about his viability.

On to the Michigan Primary!

Tony

NOTE:  AP VoteCast is a survey of more than 2,400 voters taking part in Saturday’s Republican primary in South Carolina, conducted for The Associated Press by NORC at the University of Chicago.

Brain pacemaker helps a woman with crippling depression!

A sample pacemaker-like device, used for deep brain stimulation therapy, and its electrodes which are implanted into a specific site in the brain are displayed at Mount Sinai West in New York on Dec. 20, 2023. (AP Photo/Mary Conlon)

Dear Commons Community,

Emily Hollenbeck lived with a deep, recurring depression she likened to a black hole, where gravity felt so strong and her limbs so heavy she could barely move. She knew the illness could kill her. Both of her parents had taken their lives.

She was willing to try something extreme: Having electrodes implanted in her brain as part of an experimental therapy.  As reported by The Associated Press.

Researchers say the treatment —- called deep brain stimulation, or DBS — could eventually help many of the nearly 3 million Americans like her with depression that resists other treatments. It’s approved for conditions such as Parkinson’s disease and epilepsy, and many doctors and patients hope it will become more widely available for depression soon.

The treatment gives patients targeted electrical impulses, much like a pacemaker for the brain. A growing body of recent research is promising, with more underway — although two large studies that showed no advantage to using DBS for depression temporarily halted progress, and some scientists continue to raise concerns.

Meanwhile, the Food and Drug Administration has agreed to speed up its review of Abbott Laboratories’ request to use its DBS devices for treatment-resistant depression.

“At first I was blown away because the concept of it seems so intense. Like, it’s brain surgery. You have wires embedded in your brain,” said Hollenbeck, who is part of ongoing research at Mount Sinai West. “But I also felt like at that point I tried everything, and I was desperate for an answer.”

“NOTHING ELSE WAS WORKING”

Hollenbeck suffered from depression symptoms as a child growing up in poverty and occasional homelessness. But her first major bout happened in college, after her father’s suicide in 2009. Another hit during a Teach for America stint, leaving her almost immobilized and worried she’d lose her classroom job and sink into poverty again. She landed in the hospital.

“I ended up having sort of an on-and-off pattern,” she said. After responding to medication for a while, she’d relapse.

She managed to earn a doctorate in psychology, even after losing her mom in her last year of grad school. But the black hole always returned to pull her in. At times, she said, she thought about ending her life.

She said she’d exhausted all options, including electroconvulsive therapy, when a doctor told her about DBS three years ago.

“Nothing else was working,” she said.

She became one of only a few hundred treated with DBS for depression.

Hollenbeck had the brain surgery while sedated but awake. Dr. Brian Kopell, who directs Mount Sinai’s Center for Neuromodulation, placed thin metal electrodes in a region of her brain called the subcallosal cingulate cortex, which regulates emotional behavior and is involved in feelings of sadness.

The electrodes are connected by an internal wire to a device placed under the skin in her chest, which controls the amount of electrical stimulation and delivers constant low-voltage pulses. Hollenbeck calls it “continuous Prozac.”

Doctors say the stimulation helps because electricity speaks the brain’s language. Neurons communicate using electrical and chemical signals.

In normal brains, Kopell said, electrical activity reverberates unimpeded in all areas, in a sort of dance. In depression, the dancers get stuck within the brain’s emotional circuitry. DBS seems to “unstick the circuit,” he said, allowing the brain to do what it normally would.

Hollenbeck said the effect was almost immediate.

“The first day after surgery, she started feeling a lifting of that negative mood, of the heaviness,” said her psychiatrist, Dr. Martijn Figee. “I remember her telling me that she was able to enjoy Vietnamese takeout for the first time in years and really taste the food. She started to decorate her home, which had been completely empty since she moved to New York.”

For Hollenbeck, the most profound change was finding pleasure in music again.

“When I was depressed, I couldn’t listen to music. It sounded and felt like I was listening to radio static,” she said. “Then on a sunny day in the summer, I was walking down the street listening to a song. I just felt this buoyancy, this, ‘Oh, I want to walk more, I want to go and do things!’ And I realized I’m getting better.”

She only wishes the therapy had been there for her parents.

THE TREATMENT’S HISTORY

The road to this treatment stretches back two decades, when neurologist Dr. Helen Mayberg led promising early research.

But setbacks followed. Large studies launched more than a dozen years ago showed no significant difference in response rates for treated and untreated groups. Dr. Katherine Scangos, a psychiatrist at the University of California, San Francisco, also researching DBS and depression, cited a couple of reasons: The treatment wasn’t personalized, and researchers looked at outcomes over a matter of weeks.

Some later research showed depression patients had stable, long-term relief from DBS when observed over years. Overall, across different brain targets, DBS for depression is associated with average response rates of 60%, one 2022 study said.

Treatments being tested by various teams are much more tailored to individuals today. Mount Sinai’s team is one of the most prominent researching DBS for depression in the U.S. There, a neuroimaging expert uses brain images to locate the exact spot for Kopell to place electrodes.

“We have a template, a blueprint of exactly where we’re going to go,” said Mayberg, a pioneer in DBS research and founding director of The Nash Family Center for Advanced Circuit Therapeutics at Mount Sinai. “Everybody’s brain is a little different, just like people’s eyes are a little further apart or a nose is a little bigger or smaller.”

Other research teams also tailor treatment to patients, although their methods are slightly different. Scangos and her colleagues are studying various targets in the brain and delivering stimulation only when needed for severe symptoms. She said the best therapy may end up being a combination of approaches.

As teams keep working, Abbott is launching a big clinical trial this year, ahead of a potential FDA decision.

“The field is advancing quite quickly,” Scangos said. “I’m hoping we will have approval within a short time.”

But some doctors are skeptical, pointing to potential complications such as bleeding, stroke or infection after surgery.

Dr. Stanley Caroff, an emeritus professor of psychiatry at the University of Pennsylvania, said scientists still don’t know the exact pathways or mechanisms in the brain that produce depression, which is why it’s hard to pick a site to stimulate. It’s also tough to select the right patients for DBS, he said, and approved, successful treatments for depression are available.

“I believe from a psychiatric point of view, the science is not there,” he said of DBS for depression.

MOVING FORWARD

Hollenbeck acknowledges DBS hasn’t been a cure-all; she still takes medicines for depression and needs ongoing care.

She recently visited Mayberg in her office and discussed recovery. “It’s not about being happy all the time,” the doctor told her. “It’s about making progress.”

That’s what researchers are studying now — how to track progress.

Recent research by Mayberg and others in the journal Nature showed it’s possible to provide a “readout” of how someone is doing at any given time. Analyzing the brain activity of DBS patients, researchers found a unique pattern that reflects the recovery process. This gives them an objective way to observe how people get better and distinguish between impending depression and typical mood fluctuations.

Scientists are confirming those findings using newer DBS devices in a group of patients that includes Hollenbeck.

She and other participants do their part largely at home. She gives researchers regular brain recordings by logging onto a tablet, putting a remote above the pacemaker-like device in her chest and sending the data. She answers questions that pop up about how she feels. Then she records a video that will be analyzed for things such as facial expression and speech.

Occasionally, she goes into Mount Sinai’s “Q-Lab,” an immersive environment where scientists do quantitative research collecting all sorts of data, including how she moves in a virtual forest or makes circles in the air with her arms. Like many other patients, she moves her arms faster now that she’s doing better.

Data from recordings and visits are combined with other information, such as life events, to chart how she’s doing. This helps guide doctors’ decisions, such as whether to increase her dose of electricity – which they did once.

On a recent morning, Hollenbeck moved her collar and brushed her hair aside to reveal scars on her chest and head from her DBS surgery. To her, they’re signs of how far she’s come.

She makes her way around the city, taking walks in the park and going to libraries, which were a refuge in childhood. She no longer worries that normal life challenges will trigger a crushing depression.

“The stress is pretty extreme at times, but I’m able to see and remember, even on a bodily level, that I’m going to be OK,” she said.

“If I hadn’t had DBS, I’m pretty sure I would not be alive today.”

God  bless science!

Tony

Trump Rambling and Incoherent at Nashville Speech!

Dear Commons Community,

On Thursday in Nashville, Trump gave one of his most out-of-touch speeches to date. He  claimed that “everybody on both sides” agreed with the U.S. Supreme Court decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.  As reported by Ryan Grenoble of The Huffington Post.

“They want you to say what they want you, what they want to have you say. And we’re not gonna let that happen. You’re going to say as you want and you’re going to believe, and you’re going to believe in God. You’re gonna believe in God because God is here and God is watching.”

Trump also pledged to “do [his] part to keep A.M. radio in our cars,” gave himself kudos for making “Israel” the capital of Israel, and bragged about having “forced” prayer into some schools while promising to shut down the Department of Education if he’s re-elected except for “one desk, one person, just to make sure everyone’s speaking English.”

He then butchered the word “evangelical”:

At one point Trump appeared to confuse FBI special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election with the countless right-wing conspiracies surrounding Hunter Biden’s laptop, and also said whatever this is:

“If you think about it, you have men, you have women, and you have religion. If you look at it, you have more than the men, you have more than the women. You have such power.”

Journalist and longtime Trump-watcher Aaron Rupar clipped and shared much of the speech on social media ― and even he seemed to lose the thread.

“I have no idea what Trump is talking about at this point,” he said. “If a guy sitting next to me at the bar sounded like this I would peace out.”

Tony