Elton John, Bob Dylan, and Others  Pay Tribute to Brian Wilson Who Died Yesterday!

The Beach Boys in their classic striped shirts.  Brian Wilson is bottom right.

 

Dear Commons Community,

Brian Wilson, the heart and soul of the 60s rock group, The Beach Boys, died yesterday at the age of 82.

The family of Wilson, who was a founding member of The Beach Boys, confirmed his death on Instagram, writing: “We are heartbroken to announce that our beloved father Brian Wilson has passed away. We are at a loss for words right now. Please respect our privacy at this time as our family is grieving. We realize that we are sharing our grief with the world. Love & Mercy.”

Soon after the news broke, celebrities took to social media to share their condolences.

Elton John posted on Instagram calling Wilson “the biggest influence on my songwriting ever.”

“Brian Wilson was always so kind to me from the day I met him,” John said. “He sang ‘Someone Saved My Life Tonight’ at a tribute concert in 2003, and it was an extraordinary moment for me. I played on his solo records, he sang on my album, The Union, and even performed for my AIDS Foundation.”

I grew to love him as a person,” John continued. “He was a musical genius and revolutionary. He changed the goalposts when it came to writing songs and shaped music forever. A true giant.”

Bob Dylan posted his condolences on X.

“Heard the sad news about Brian today and thought about all the years I’ve been listening to him and admiring his genius,” Dylan wrote. “Rest in peace dear Brian.”

The Beach Boys themselves shared a tribute on Instagram, writing in part, “Brian Wilson wasn’t just the heart of The Beach Boys — he was the soul of our sound. The melodies he dreamed up and the emotions he poured into every note changed the course of music forever. His unparalleled talent and unique spirit created the soundtrack of so many lives around the globe, including our own. Together, we gave the world the American dream of optimism, joy, and a sense of freedom — music that made people feel good, made them believe in summer and endless possibilities.”

In  the 1960s, there were so many great rock groups including the Rolling Stones, the Temptations, the Four Tops, etc. but The Beach Boys had a sound that was all theirs. Brian Wilson made it so!

May he rest in peace!

Tony

Time Magazine: Democrats in Disarray – After the 2024 fiasco, the party is rethinking everything

TIME photo illustration; Source Images (Donkey: Richard Bailey—Corbis/Getty Images; Paper: MirageC/Moment/Getty.

 

Dear Commons Community,

Time Magazine has a featured article describing the Democrat Party  in disarray as a result of the shellacking it took in the 2024 elections. The Time cover above says it all.  Here is an excerpt.

“Like a lot of Democrats these days, Chris Murphy has been doing some soul searching. For years, the Connecticut Senator, who took office shortly after the mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown, was one of the nation’s most outspoken advocates for tighter gun laws. Gun safety was so important, he argued, that supporting an assault-weapons ban should be mandatory for Democratic leaders. 

Recently, Murphy has come to believe he was wrong. Not about tougher gun laws, but about trying to force all Democrats to adopt his position. “I bear some responsibility for where we are today,” he told me in a phone interview in April. “I spent a long time trying to make the issue of guns a litmus test for the Democratic Party. I think that all of the interest groups that ended up trying to apply a litmus test for their issue ended up making our coalition a lot smaller.”

Murphy’s shift in thinking is part of the reckoning that has gripped the party since President Donald Trump’s victory in November. Democrats could dismiss Trump’s first win as a fluke. His second, they know, was the product of catastrophic failure—a nationwide rejection of Democratic policies, Democratic messaging, and the Democrats themselves. The party got skunked in every battleground state and lost the popular vote for the first time in 20 years. They lost the House and the Senate. Their support sagged with almost every demographic cohort except Black women and college-educated voters. Only 35% of Democrats are optimistic about the future of the party, according to a May 14 AP poll, down from nearly 6 in 10 last July. Democrats have no mojo, no power, and no unifying leader to look to for a fresh start.

Everyone knows how bad things are. “As weak as I’ve ever seen it,” says Representative Jared Golden of Maine, who represents a district Trump won. Trump’s second term is “worse than everyone imagined,” says Nevada Senator Jacky Rosen. The Democratic National Committee has offered few answers as it prepares to release a “postelection review” sometime this summer. “I don’t like to call it an ‘autopsy’ because our party’s not dead—we’re still alive and kicking,” explains Ken Martin, the new party chair. “Maybe barely, but we are.”

You already know most of the reasons for the 2024 fiasco. Joe Biden was too old to be President, and just about everybody but Joe Biden knew it. His sheer oldness undermined all efforts to sell his policies effectively. Democrats lost touch with the working class, with men, with voters of color, with the young. Voters saw Democrats as henpecked by college-campus progressives, overly focused on “woke” issues like diversity and trans rights. They tried to convince people that the economy was good when it didn’t feel good; they tried to convince people that inflation and illegal immigration were imaginary problems. In an era when voters around the globe were in an anti-incumbent mood, Democrats were stuck defending the status quo. The pandemic election of 2020 and the post-Dobbs midterms in 2022 lulled top party officials into a dangerous complacency. They thought Americans hated Trump enough to accept an unsatisfying alternative. They thought wrong.”

They thought wrong “big time”!

Tony

Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs has vetoed a proposal that would have banned teaching antisemitism at the state’s public schools and colleges!

Arizona Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs, center, applauds for those affected by the Los Angeles area wildfires as she gives the State of the State address in the House of Representatives at the state Capitol with Speaker of the House Rep. Steve Montenegro, R-Litchfield Park, left, and Senate President Warren Petersen, R-Gilbert, flanking the governor on Jan. 13, 2025, in Phoenix. (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin, File)

Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs

Dear Commons Community,

Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs has vetoed a proposal that would have banned teaching antisemitism at the state’s public K-12 schools, universities and colleges and exposed educators who violate the new rules to discipline and lawsuits.

The proposal would have prohibited teachers and administrators from teaching or promoting antisemitism or antisemitic actions that create a hostile environment, calling for the genocide of any group or requiring students to advocate for an antisemitic point of view. It also would have barred public schools from using public money to support the teaching of antisemitism.

Educators would have personally been responsible for covering the costs of damages in lawsuits for violating the rules.

Hobbs, a Democrat, said yesterday that the bill was not about antisemitism but rather about attacking teachers.  As reported by The Associated Press.

“It puts an unacceptable level of personal liability in place for our public school, community college, and university educators and staff, opening them up to threats of personally costly lawsuits,” she said in a statement. “Additionally, it sets a dangerous precedent that unfairly targets public school teachers while shielding private school staff.”

Hobbs described antisemitism as a very troubling issue in the U.S., but said students and parents can go through the state’s Board of Education to report antisemitism.

The measure cleared the Legislature last week on a 33-20 vote by the House, including a few Democrats who crossed party lines to support it. It’s one of a few proposals to combat antisemitism across the country.

Democrats tried but failed to remove the lawsuit provision and swap out references to antisemitism within the bill with “unlawful discrimination” to reflect other discrimination.

The bill’s chief sponsor, Republican Rep. Michael Way, of Queen Creek, called the veto “disgraceful,” saying on the social media platform X that the legislation was meant to keep “egregious and blatant antisemitic content” out of the classroom.

“To suggest that it threatened the speech of most Arizona teachers is disingenuous at best,” he added.

Opponents said the bill aimed to silence people who want to speak out on the oppression of Palestinians and opened up educators to personal legal liability in lawsuits students could file.

Students over the age of 18 and the parents of younger pupils would have been able to file lawsuits over violations that create a hostile education environment, leaving teachers responsible for paying any damages that may be awarded, denying them immunity and prohibiting the state from paying any judgments arising from any such lawsuits.

Last week, Lori Shepherd, executive director of Tucson Jewish Museum & Holocaust Center, wrote in a letter to Hobbs that if the bill were approved it would threaten teachers’ ability to provide students with a full account of the holocaust.

Under the bill, “those discussions could be deemed ‘antisemitic’ depending on how a single phrase is interpreted, regardless of intent or context,” she said.

The bill would have created a process for punishing those who break the rules. At K-12 schools, a first-offense violation would lead to a reprimand, a second offense to a suspension of a teacher or principal’s certificate and a third offense to a revocation of the certificate.

At colleges and universities, violators would have faced a reprimand on first offense, a suspension without pay for a second offense and termination for a third offense. The proposal also would have required colleges and universities to consider violations by employees to be a negative factor when making employment or tenure decisions.

Under the proposal, universities and colleges couldn’t recognize any student organization that invites a guest speaker who incites antisemitism, encourages its members to engage in antisemitism or calls for the genocide of any group.

Courageous decision on the part of Governor Hobbs!

Tony

ABC News Reporter Terry Moran: “Trump adviser Stephen Miller is a world-class hater”

Terry Moran and Stephen Miller

Dear Commons Community,

ABC News reporter Terry Moran has been suspended from the air after sharing an incendiary social media post about one of  Trump’s key advisers.

In the early hours on Sunday, Moran, the 65-year-old senior national corresponden,  took to X to share a post about Stephen Miller, the president’s homeland security adviser and deputy chief of staff for policy.

Moran referred to both Miller and Trump as “world-class hater[s]” in the post, which has since been deleted.

A spokesperson for ABC News commented on the post in a statement shared with PEOPLE, noting that Moran “has been suspended pending further evaluation.”

“ABC News stands for objectivity and impartiality in its news coverage and does not condone subjective personal attacks on others. The post does not reflect the views of ABC News and violated our standards,” their statement noted.

Moran took aim at Miller and the president in the post, which was shared shortly after midnight on Sunday.

“The thing about Stephen Miller is not that he is the brains behind Trumpism,” Moran wrote. “Yes, he is one of the people who conceptualizes the impulses of the Trumpist movement and translates them into policy. But that’s not what’s interesting about Miller.”

The reporter continued: “It’s not brains. It’s bile. Miller is a man who is richly endowed with the capacity for hatred. He’s a world-class hater. You can see this just by looking at him because you can see that his hatreds are his spiritual nourishment. He eats his hate.”

“Trump is a world-class hater. But his hatred is only a means to an end, and that end is his own glorification. That’s his spiritual nourishment,” he concluded.

Don’t hold back, Terry!

Tony

P.S.

After the above was posted,  ABC News announced:

“We are at the end of our agreement with Terry Moran and based on his recent post — which was a clear violation of ABC News policies — we have made the decision to not renew his contract.”

Congresswoman Maxine Waters  –  Trump is  a “cruel, dishonorable human being” for deploying National Guard in Los Angeles

Maxine Waters

Dear Commons Community,

In an interview with the CNN correspondent Kyung Lah, California Democrat Representative Maxine Waters described Trump as a “cruel, dishonorable human being” while addressing his decision to deploy the National Guard. Waters spoke to Lah after attempting to visit David Huerta, the President of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), who was arrested during the protests at the weekend. Waters expressed her surprise at the equipment and weapons the troops had.

Showing images of the Guardsmen in LA, Lah said during the broadcast, “And then I want you to take a look at what these Guardsmen are carrying. You can see these large sticks. We saw them about 15 minutes ago, pull them out and take a more aggressive posture, as if to be prepared to push back the crowd.” 

Lah continued in her broadcast: “But then the weapon that they’re holding are standard issue M4 weapons. They’re military M4 rifles. And take a closer look at that magazine. Those are magazines suggesting that they are indeed loaded with ammunition.” As the camera showed the crowd gathering in the California city, she continued, “And I want you to take a larger look at this crowd that we have.

“This isn’t a sizable crowd, it’s a growing crowd, but this is what they are seeing here in downtown Los Angeles, an incredible militarized force. It actually brought congresswoman Maxine Waters, down here to the Metropolitan Detention Center. She tried to get inside to talk to the president of SEIU, he was detained. She could not get in. The door indeed was slammed in her face. And then here’s what she said about the militarization she’s seeing here in downtown Los Angeles.”

Talking about the weapons seen in the images, Waters said, “I don’t know why we have guns. What are those guns for? Are they to shoot protesters? I mean, there’s no reason to be here with the National Guard.

“The President of the United States is a cruel, dishonorable human being who would just as soon they shoot somebody down. But I don’t want that to happen. I do not want – I want the elected officials to do everything that we can to dissuade them.”

After airing the interview, the CNN correspondent concluded, “Here’s the concern. It’s the cauldron that has been created today by the deployment of the National Guard, by how people are feeling about these ICE arrests that occurred on Friday, what that clash could mean today here on the streets of Los Angeles.”

The Guard was deployed specifically to protect federal buildings, including the downtown detention center where protesters concentrated. Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDonnell said officers were “overwhelmed” by the remaining protesters – and said they included regular agitators who show up at demonstrations to cause trouble.

Several dozen people were arrested throughout the weekend of protest. One was detained Sunday for throwing a Molotov cocktail at police, and another for ramming a motorcycle into a line of officers. Trump responded to McDonnell on Truth Social, telling him to arrest protesters in face masks. “Looking really bad in L.A. BRING IN THE TROOPS!!!” he wrote.

Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom requested Trump remove the guard members in a letter Sunday afternoon, calling their deployment a “serious breach of state sovereignty.” His comments were echoed by Mayor Karen Bass who said in an afternoon press conference, “What we’re seeing in Los Angeles is chaos that is provoked by the administration. This is about another agenda, this isn’t about public safety.”

Tony

Elon Musk Mulling Over Starting a New “America” Political Party Amid Trump Feud?

Dear Commons Community,

In an escalation of Elon Musk’s fractured relationship with President Donald Trump and his Republican allies, the Tesla CEO has floated the idea of starting a new political party to rival the two-party system.

Musk conducted a poll via his social media platform X (formerly Twitter), asking his 220 million followers: “Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?” The public results show that around 80% of respondents voted yes.

“The people have spoken. A new political party is needed in America to represent the 80% in the middle!” Musk said, reacting to the results of his Thursday, June 5, poll. “And exactly 80% of people agree…This is Fate.”  As reported by Time.

On Friday, Musk shared a potential name: “The America Party.” The moniker echoes that of his super political action committee (PAC), America PAC, which was founded in 2024 to support Trump’s efforts to return to the White House. The super PAC reportedly spent around $200 million to help elect Trump. Musk’s donations made him Trump’s largest, and most prominent, donor in the 2024 election.

Meanwhile, when talking to NBC News on Saturday, Trump said that Musk will “have to pay the consequences” if he opts to fund Democratic candidates in light of their feud. The President declined to say what those consequences would be.

“I’m not going to say, but he’ll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that,” Trump said.

In 2016 and 2020, Musk voted for Trump’s Democratic opponents—Hillary Clinton and former President Joe Biden, respectively. But during the 2022 midterm elections, Musk said he intended to vote Republican, and that later developed into him becoming Trump’s close ally, which was cemented when the President positioned him as lead of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a role he held until recently.

However, Trump and Musk have now had an explosive fall-out, which has played out in the public arena via social media over the past few days. It started with Musk’s disapproval over Trump’s “Big, Beautiful Bill,” which he called an “abomination” and told his social media followers to “call your Senator, call your Congressman… kill the bill.”

On Thursday, the back-and-forth between the two influential men escalated, with Musk alleging that Trump is listed in the files related to the late financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. “That is the real reason they have not been made public,” Musk said. He did not provide evidence pertaining to this and, as of early Saturday morning, the post has been deleted.

Musk also, in another since-deleted X post, endorsed a message that said: “Trump should be impeached” and that Vance “should replace him.”

Trump has argued on his own social media platform, Truth Social, that “Elon was wearing thin” and that he asked the Tesla CEO to leave the White House.

Starting a new political party is a good idea.  The Republicans have lost their souls under Trump and the Democrats are leaderless.

Tony

At Amazon, coder jobs have begun to resemble warehouse work!

Dear Commons Community,

Since at least the industrial revolution, workers have worried that machines would replace them.

But when technology transformed automaking, meatpacking and even secretarial work, the response typically wasn’t to slash jobs and reduce the number of workers. It was to “degrade” the jobs, breaking them into simpler tasks to be performed over and over at a rapid clip. Small shops of skilled mechanics gave way to hundreds of workers spread across an assembly line. The personal secretary gave way to pools of typists and data-entry clerks.

The workers “complained of speedup, work intensification and work degradation,” as labor historian Jason Resnikoff described it.

Something similar appears to be happening with artificial intelligence in one of the fields where it has been most widely adopted: coding.  As reported by The New York Times and The Seattle Times.

As AI spreads through the labor force, many white-collar workers have expressed concern that it will lead to mass unemployment. Joblessness has ticked up and widespread layoffs might eventually come, but the more immediate downside for software engineers appears to be a change in the quality of their work. Some say it is becoming more routine, less thoughtful and, crucially, much faster paced.

Companies seem to be convinced that, like assembly lines of old, AI can increase productivity. A recent paper by researchers at Microsoft and three universities found that programmers’ use of an AI coding assistant called Copilot, which proposes snippets of code that they can accept or reject, increased a key measure of output more than 25%.

At Amazon, which is making big investments in generative AI, the culture of coding is changing rapidly. In his recent letter to shareholders, CEO Andy Jassy wrote that generative AI was yielding big returns for companies that use it for “productivity and cost avoidance.” He said working faster was essential because competitors would gain ground if Amazon doesn’t give customers what they want “as quickly as possible” and cited coding as an activity where AI would “change the norms.”

Those changing norms have not always been eagerly embraced. Three Amazon engineers said managers had increasingly pushed them to use AI in their work over the past year. The engineers said the company had raised output goals and had become less forgiving about deadlines. It has even encouraged coders to gin up new AI productivity tools at an upcoming hackathon, an internal coding competition. One Amazon engineer said his team was roughly half the size it was last year, but it was expected to produce roughly the same amount of code by using AI.

Amazon said it conducts regular reviews to make sure teams are adequately staffed and may increase their size if necessary. “We’ll continue to adapt how we incorporate Gen AI into our processes,” Brad Glasser, an Amazon spokesperson, said.

Other tech companies are moving in the same direction. In a memo to employees in April, the CEO of Shopify, a company that helps entrepreneurs build and manage e-commerce websites, announced that “AI usage is now a baseline expectation” and that the company would “add AI usage questions” to performance reviews.

Google recently told employees that it would soon hold a companywide hackathon in which one category would be creating AI tools that could “enhance their overall daily productivity,” according to an internal announcement. Winning teams will receive $10,000. A Google spokesperson noted that more than 30% of the company’s code is now suggested by AI and accepted by developers.

The shift has not been all negative for workers. At Amazon and other companies, managers argue that AI can relieve employees of tedious tasks and enable them to perform more interesting work. Jassy wrote last year that the company had saved “the equivalent of 4,500 developer-years” by using AI to do the thankless work of upgrading old software.Eliminating such tedious work may benefit a subset of accomplished programmers, said Lawrence Katz, a labor economist at Harvard University who has tracked research on the subject closely.

But for inexperienced programmers, the result of introducing AI can resemble the shift from artisanal work to factory work in the 19th and 20th centuries.

“Things look like a speedup for knowledge workers,” Katz said, describing preliminary evidence from ongoing research. “There is a sense that the employer can pile on more stuff.”

Bystanders in Their Own Jobs

The automation of coding has special resonance for Amazon engineers, who have watched their blue-collar counterparts undergo a similar transition.

For years, many workers at Amazon warehouses walked miles each day to track down inventory. But over the past decade, Amazon has increasingly relied on so-called robotics warehouses, where pickers stand in one spot and pull inventory off shelves delivered to them by lawn-mower-like robots, no walking necessary.

The robots generally haven’t displaced humans; Amazon said it has hired hundreds of thousands of warehouse workers since their introduction, while creating many new skilled roles. But the robots have increased the number of items each worker can pick from dozens an hour to hundreds. Some workers complain that the robots have also made the job hyper-repetitive and physically taxing. Amazon says it provides regular breaks and cites positive feedback from workers about its cutting-edge robots.The Amazon engineers said this transition was on their minds as the company urged them to rely more on AI. They said that while doing so was technically optional, they had little choice if they wanted to keep up with their output goals, which affect their performance reviews.

The expectations have sped up rapidly. One engineer said that building a feature for the website used to take a few weeks; now it must frequently be done within a few days. He said this is possible only by using AI to help automate the coding and by cutting down on meetings to solicit feedback and explore alternative ideas. (A second engineer said her efficiency gains from using AI were more modest; different teams use the tools more or less intensively.)

The new approach to coding at many companies has, in effect, eliminated much of the time the developer spends reflecting on his or her work.

“It used to be that you had a lot of slack because you were doing a complicated project — it would maybe take a month, maybe take two months, and no one could monitor it,” Katz said. “Now, you have the whole thing monitored, and it can be done quickly.”

As at Microsoft, many Amazon engineers use an AI assistant that suggests lines of code. But the company has more recently rolled out AI tools that can generate large portions of a program on its own. One engineer called the tools “scarily good.” The engineers said that many colleagues have been reluctant to use these new tools because they require a lot of double-checking and because the engineers want more control.

“It’s more fun to write code than to read code,” said Simon Willison, an AI fan who is a longtime programmer and blogger, channeling the objections of other programmers. “If you’re told you have to do a code review, it’s never a fun part of the job. When you’re working with these tools, it’s most of the job.”

This shift from writing to reading code can make engineers feel like bystanders in their own jobs. The Amazon engineers said that managers have encouraged them to use AI to help write one-page memos proposing a solution to a software problem and that the artificial intelligence can now generate a rough draft from scattered thoughts.

They also use AI to test the software features they build, a tedious job that nonetheless has forced them to think deeply about their coding. One said that automating these functions could deprive junior engineers of the know-how they need to get promoted.

Amazon said that collaboration and experimentation remain critical and that it considers AI a tool for augmenting rather than replacing engineers’ expertise.

It said it makes the requirements for promotions clear to employees.

Harper Reed, another longtime programmer and blogger who was the chief technology officer of former President Barack Obama’s reelection campaign, agreed that career advancement for engineers could be an issue in an AI world. But he cautioned against being overly precious about the value of deeply understanding one’s code, which is no longer necessary to ensure that it works.

“It would be crazy if in an auto factory people were measuring to make sure every angle is correct,” he said, since machines now do the work. “It’s not as important as when it was group of 10 people pounding out the metal.”

And just as factories abroad have made it cheap and easy for entrepreneurs to manufacture physical products, the rise of AI is likely to democratize software-making, lowering the cost of building new apps.

“If you’re a prototyper, this is a gift from heaven,” Willison said. “You can knock something out that illustrates the idea.”

The Dreaded Speedup

Amid their frustration, many Amazon engineers have joined a group called Amazon Employees for Climate Justice, which is pressuring the company to reduce its carbon footprint and has become a clearinghouse for workers’ anxieties about other issues, like return-to-office mandates. (Amazon said it is working to reduce carbon emissions from its data centers; the climate justice group is pushing it to provide more information on how.)

The group’s organizers say they are in touch with several hundred Amazon employees on a regular basis and that the workers increasingly discuss the stress of using AI on the job, in addition to the effect that the technology has on the climate.

The complaints have centered around “what their careers are going to look like,” said Eliza Pan, a former Amazon employee who is a representative for the group. “And not just their careers but the quality of the work.”

While there is no rush to form a union for coders at Amazon, such a move would not be unheard-of. When General Motors workers went on strike in 1936 to demand recognition of their union, the United Auto Workers, it was the dreaded speedup that spurred them on.

The typical worker felt “that he was not free, as perhaps he had been on some previous job, to set the pace of his work,” historian Sidney Fine wrote, “and to determine the manner in which it was to be performed.”

Tony

Trump deploys California National Guard to LA to quell protests despite the Governor Newsom’s objections

Border Patrol personnel deploy tear gas on June 7, 20205, during a demonstration in Paramount, California. (AP Photo/Eric Thayer)

Dear Commons Community,

President Donald Trump is deploying 2,000 California National Guard troops to Los Angeles over the objections of Governot Gavin Newsom after a second day of clashes between hundreds of protesters and federal immigration authorities in riot gear.  As reported by the Associated Press.

Confrontations broke out yesterday near a Home Depot in the heavily Latino city of Paramount, south of Los Angeles, where federal agents were staging at a Department of Homeland Security office nearby. Agents unleashed tear gas, flash-bang explosives and pepper balls, and protesters hurled rocks and cement at Border Patrol vehicles. Smoke wafted from small piles of burning refuse in the streets.

Tensions were high after a series of sweeps by immigration authorities the previous day, including in LA’s fashion district and at a Home Depot, as the weeklong tally of immigrant arrests in the city climbed past 100. A prominent union leader was arrested while protesting and accused of impeding law enforcement.

The White House announced that Trump would deploy the Guard to “address the lawlessness that has been allowed to fester.” It wasn’t clear when the troops would arrive.

Newsom, a Democrat, said in a post on the social platform X that it was “purposefully inflammatory and will only escalate tensions.” He later said the federal government wants a spectacle and urged people not to give them one by becoming violent.

In a signal of the administration’s aggressive approach, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth threatened to deploy the U.S. military.

“If violence continues, active-duty Marines at Camp Pendleton will also be mobilized — they are on high alert,” Hegseth said on X.

Trump’s order came after clashes in Paramount and neighboring Compton, where a car was set on fire. Protests continued into the evening in Paramount, with several hundred demonstrators gathered near a doughnut shop, and authorities holding up barbed wire to keep the crowd back.

Crowds also gathered again outside federal buildings in downtown Los Angeles, including a detention center, where local police declared an unlawful assembly and began to arrest people.

Standoff in Paramount

Earlier in Paramount, immigration officers faced off with demonstrators at the entrance to a business park, across from the back of a Home Depot. They set off fireworks and pulled shopping carts into the street, broke up cinder blocks and pelted a procession of Border Patrol vans as they departed and careened down a boulevard.

U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli said federal agents made more arrests of people with deportation orders on Saturday, but none at the Home Depot. The Department of Homeland Security has a building next door and agents were staging there as they prepared to carry out operations, he said on Fox11 Los Angeles. He didn’t say how many people were arrested Saturday or where.

Paramount Mayor Peggy Lemons told multiple news outlets that community members showed up in response because people are fearful about activity by immigration agents.

“When you handle things the way that this appears to be handled, it’s not a surprise that chaos would follow,” Lemons said.

Some demonstrators jeered at officers while recording the events on smartphones.

“ICE out of Paramount. We see you for what you are,” a woman said through a megaphone. “You are not welcome here.”

More than a dozen people were arrested and accused of impeding immigration agents, Essayli posted on X, including the names and mug shots of some of those arrested. He didn’t say where they were protesting.

Trump calls up the Guard

Trump federalized part of California’s National Guard under what is known as Title 10 authority, which places him, not the governor, atop the chain of command, according to Newsom’s office.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement that the work the immigration authorities were doing when met with protests is “essential to halting and reversing the invasion of illegal criminals into the United States. In the wake of this violence, California’s feckless Democrat leaders have completely abdicated their responsibility to protect their citizens.”

The president’s move came shortly after he issued a threat on his social media network saying that if Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass did not “do their jobs,” then “the Federal Government will step in and solve the problem, RIOTS & LOOTERS, the way it should be solved!!!”

Newsom said in his statement that local authorities “are able to access law enforcement assistance at a moment’s notice,” and “there is currently no unmet need.”

The California Highway Patrol said Newsom directed it to deploy additional officers to “maintain public safety.”

Tony

Yurong Luanna Jiang, Chinese Student, Trolled Over ‘Humanity’ Speech at Harvard

Yurong Luanna Jiang

Dear Commons Community,

A Chinese graduate student drew wide applause with a speech at Harvard’s commencement ceremonies in late May. Online, it was a different story.

In her address, Yurong Luanna Jiang, who studied international development at the Harvard Kennedy School, spoke about her program’s diverse student body, recounting how on an internship in Mongolia last year she helped Indian and Thai classmates in Tanzania translate writing on a made-in-China washing machine over the phone.  As reported by The Wall Street Jounral.

Wearing an embroidered and beaded Chinese collar over her graduation robe, Jiang used the anecdote to extol the idea that “humanity rises and falls as one.”

The speech, as Harvard grapples with the federal government’s attempt to stop it from enrolling international students, was delivered in an often trembling voice. Jiang seemed close to tears as she said, “If there’s a woman anywhere in the world who can’t afford a period pad, it makes me poorer.” Faculty and students clapped at the line and at the speech’s conclusion: “We are bound by something deeper than belief: our shared humanity.”

Then came the online attacks, from both Chinese nationalists and Beijing critics. At a time when Harvard’s links to China and Chinese students in the U.S. have come under the Trump administration’s microscope, it illustrated the no-win situation for a group of students often viewed with suspicion over their allegiances both at home and in their host country.

Jiang said the video was subtitled and uploaded by friends who picked up the translation as a familiar expression that is “quite common in everyday language.”

Exiled Hong Kong pro-democracy activist Nathan Law said in a tweet criticizing Harvard’s choice of Jiang as a speaker that her use of phrases such as “shared future” and “shared humanity” mirrored a “worldview designed to allow Beijing to bypass democratic norms and scrutiny.”

“In some ways, my own experience has become a living illustration of my speech that we are living in a divided world in a hard time,” Jiang said in a statement to The Wall Street Journal. “It’s surreal to find myself accused simultaneously of being a U.S. spy and a Chinese spy.”

In China, online sleuths unearthed details of Jiang’s background, which led to more condemnation of her alleged privilege and ties to the West, including her education at a U.K. high school and Duke University undergraduate studies. Critics seized on her father’s alleged affiliation with a state-backed environmental organization, suggesting it had helped her get accepted at Harvard.

A few days after her speech, Jiang took to Chinese social media to defend herself. She said she grew up in an unstable family and had been bullied in middle school. She said her father had an unpaid position at the state-backed environment organization and hadn’t pulled strings to get her accepted at Harvard.

Other commentators drew attention to a video from a 2024 speech by Chinese Ambassador Xie Feng at the Harvard Kennedy School that showed Jiang standing behind the stage, watching as a protester was being removed from the audience by another student, an incident widely criticized by Republican lawmakers. Rep. John Moolenaar (R., Mich.), chairman of a House select committee on the Chinese Communist Party, called the removal of the student the work of a “pro-CCP agitator” who faced no blowback from the university.

Jiang declined to comment on the event. A person close to her said Jiang wasn’t involved in either the organization of the event or the removal of the student.

Harvard declined to comment, citing student privacy but referred to a website detailing how the university selects graduate ceremony speakers.

For decades, Harvard has trained scholars, entrepreneurs, doctors and executives from humble backgrounds in China. The Ivy League university has also provided training to many Chinese bureaucrats and education to the children of some top Communist Party officials. Harvard’s alleged ties with the Communist Party have emerged as a leading line of attack in President Trump’s pressure campaign against Harvard.

It wasn’t the first time a Chinese student in the U.S. has faced online vitriol.

In 2017, Yang Shuping, a Chinese graduate of the University of Maryland, faced criticism after she called American air quality “fresh and sweet, and oddly luxurious” in a commencement speech and said that in China she wore a face mask against the pollution. Critics said she was pandering to her U.S. audience by implicitly criticizing China.

On her Chinese social-media account, Yang apologized, saying she loved her homeland and was proud of its prosperity and development.

Tony