Norovirus cases are surging in parts of the US, CDC data shows

This electron microscope image provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention shows a cluster of norovirus virions. (Charles D. Humphrey/CDC via AP, File)

Dear Commons Community,

Cases of a wretched stomach bug are surging in parts of the United States this winter, according to government data.

The most recent numbers from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention show there were 91 outbreaks of norovirus reported during the week of Dec. 5, up from 69 outbreaks the last week of November.  As reported by The Associated Press.

Numbers from the past few years show a maximum of 65 outbreaks reported during that first week of December.

A norovirus infection is characterized by sudden vomiting and diarrhea. Outbreaks are often seen on cruise ships, in congregate living situations like nursing homes and jails, as well as schools and places where people are close together.

Here are a few things to know about the virus.

What is norovirus?

Norovirus is the leading cause of foodborne illness in the United States, responsible for 58% of such infections acquired in the country each year, according to the CDC.

Norovirus infections are caused by a group of viruses that spread easily, with as few as 10 viral particles having the ability to make someone sick, health experts say.

There are about 2,500 norovirus outbreaks reported annually in the United States. The outbreaks can occur throughout the year but are most common from November to April.

Along with with vomiting and diarrhea, common symptoms include nausea, stomach pain, body ache, headache and fever.

How do you get it?

Most norovirus outbreaks occur when people who are already infected spread the virus to others by direct means, such as through sharing food or eating utensils. Outbreaks can also be spread through food, water or contaminated surfaces .

How long do you stay sick?

Illness caused by norovirus typically starts suddenly, with symptoms developing 12 to 48 hours following exposure to the virus. Most people get better within one to three days and recover fully.

But with 19 to 21 million illnesses each year in the United States, norovirus nevertheless causes on average 900 deaths and 109,000 hospitalizations annually, mostly among adults aged 65 and older. It also leads to 465,000 emergency department visits, mostly involving young children.

Who’s at risk?

People of all ages can get infected and fall sick from norovirus. Young children, older people and those with weakened immune systems are most at risk, with dehydration from vomiting and diarrhea the top concern.

There is no medication to treat norovirus. Rehydration is recommended by drinking water and other liquids, with the exception of coffee, tea and alcohol.

Anyone suffering from dehydration should seek medical help. Symptoms of dehydration include a decrease in urination, dry mouth and throat, and feeling dizzy when standing. Dehydrated children may be unusually sleepy or fussy and cry with few or no tears.

How can I protect myself?

Rigorous and frequent handwashing is the best defense against norovirus during the peak winter season, scrubbing the hands with soap and warm water for 20 seconds before meals.

Scrubbing surfaces with household disinfectants can also help.

This is a nasty sounding ailment.

Tony

 

 

Trump loses appeal of E. Jean Carroll $5-million defamation, sexual assault verdict

E. Jean Carroll and Donald Trump. Trump sexually abused Carroll in the 1990s and then defamed her by branding her a liar.  (Eduardo Munoz/Reuters, Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images)

Dear Commons Community,

A federal appeals court yesterday upheld a $5-million verdict that E. Jean Carroll won against Donald Trump when a jury found the U.S. president-elect liable for sexually abusing and later defaming the former magazine columnist.

A unanimous three-judge panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan rejected Trump’s argument that the trial judge should not have let jurors hear evidence about the Republican’s alleged past sexual misconduct, making the trial and verdict unfair.  As reported by Reuters.

The court said that evidence, including Trump bragging about his sexual prowess on an “Access Hollywood” video that surfaced during the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign, established a “repeated, idiosyncratic pattern of conduct” consistent with Carroll’s allegations.

“Taking the record as a whole and considering the strength of Ms. Carroll’s case, we are not persuaded that any claimed error or combination of errors in the district court’s evidentiary rulings affected Mr. Trump’s substantial rights,” the court said in an unsigned decision.

The May 2023 verdict stemmed from an incident around 1996 in a Bergdorf Goodman department store dressing room in Manhattan, where Carroll, now 81, said Trump raped her, and an October 2022 Truth Social post where Trump denied Carroll’s claim as a hoax.

Though jurors in federal court in Manhattan did not find that Trump, 78, committed rape, they awarded the former Elle magazine advice columnist $2.02 million for sexual assault and $2.98 million for defamation.

A different jury ordered Trump in January to pay Carroll $83.3 million for defaming her and damaging her reputation in June 2019, when he first denied her rape claim.

In both denials, Trump said he did not know Carroll, she was “not my type,” and that she fabricated the rape claim to promote her memoir.

Steven Cheung, a Trump spokesperson, said in a statement that Americans “demand an immediate end to the political weaponization of our justice system and a swift dismissal of all of the Witch Hunts, including the Democrat-funded Carroll Hoax, which will continue to be appealed.”

It was not clear if any appeal would go to the U.S. Supreme Court. Trump tapped Cheung last month to be his White House communications director.

Roberta Kaplan, a lawyer for Carroll, said in a statement: “E. Jean Carroll and I are gratified by today’s decision.”

Carroll’s cases are continuing despite Trump’s having won a second four-year White House term.

In 1997, in a case involving former President Bill Clinton, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously that sitting presidents have no immunity from civil litigation in federal court over actions predating and unrelated to their official duties as president.

Trump argued the $5-million verdict should be thrown out because the trial judge, U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan, who is not related to Roberta Kaplan, should not have let jurors hear testimony from two other women who accused him of sexual misconduct.

One, businesswoman Jessica Leeds, said Trump groped her on a plane in the late 1970s. The other, former People magazine writer Natasha Stoynoff, said Trump forcibly kissed her at his Mar-a-Lago estate in 2005.

Trump’s lawyers also said the trial judge should not have let jurors watch the 2005 “Access Hollywood” video, where Trump boasted graphically about forcing himself on women.

But the appeals court said that in each of these encounters, “Mr. Trump engaged in an ordinary conversation with a woman he barely knew, then abruptly lunged at her in a semi-public place and proceeded to kiss and forcefully touch her without her consent.”

It said this was “relevant to show a pattern tending to directly corroborate witness testimony and to confirm that the alleged sexual assault (of Carroll) actually occurred.”

The court also rejected Trump’s claim that Kaplan should have allowed evidence that a prominent Democratic critic, billionaire LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman, funded Carroll’s case, saying it had “little probative value.” Carroll is also a Democrat.

Judge Kaplan also oversaw the trial that ended with the $83.3 million verdict.

What a guy!

Tony

Jimmy Carter: Many evolutions for a centenarian ‘citizen of the world’

Former President Jimmy Carter accepts the O’Connor Justice Prize from former U.S. Ambassador to Finland Barbara Barrett at The Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law at Arizona State University in Phoenix, Jan. 27, 2017. The prize recognizes people who have made extraordinary contributions to advancing the rule of law, justice and human rights. (AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin, File)

Dear Commons Community,

Former President Jimmy Carter died yesterday in Plains, Georgia.  Below is beautiful obituary courtesy of The Associated Press, describing him as a “citizen of the world.” I remember his presidency well. I always felt he was too decent a person for the position.

May he rest in peace!

Tony

———————————————-

Many evolutions for a centenarian ‘citizen of the world’

By  BILL BARROW

PLAINS, Ga. (AP) — Newly married and sworn as a Naval officer, Jimmy Carter left his tiny hometown in 1946 hoping to climb the ranks and see the world.

Less than a decade later, the death of his father and namesake, a merchant farmer and local politician who went by “Mr. Earl,” prompted the submariner and his wife, Rosalynn, to return to the rural life of Plains, Georgia, they thought they’d escaped.

The lieutenant never would be an admiral. Instead, he became commander in chief. Years after his presidency ended in humbling defeat, he would add a Nobel Peace Prize, awarded not for his White House accomplishments but “for his decades of untiring effort to find peaceful solutions to international conflicts, to advance democracy and human rights, and to promote economic and social development.”

The life of James Earl Carter Jr., the 39th and longest-lived U.S. president, ended Sunday at the age of 100 where it began: Plains, the town of 600 that fueled his political rise, welcomed him after his fall and sustained him during 40 years of service that redefined what it means to be a former president.

With the stubborn confidence of an engineer and an optimism rooted in his Baptist faith, Carter described his motivations in politics and beyond in the same way: an almost missionary zeal to solve problems and improve lives.

Carter was raised amid racism, abject poverty and hard rural living — realities that shaped both his deliberate politics and emphasis on human rights.

“He always felt a responsibility to help people,” said Jill Stuckey, a longtime friend of Carter’s in Plains. “And when he couldn’t make change wherever he was, he decided he had to go higher.”

Defying expectations

Carter’s path, a mix of happenstance and calculation, pitted moral imperatives against political pragmatism; and it defied typical labels of American politics, especially caricatures of one-term presidents as failures.

“We shouldn’t judge presidents by how popular they are in their day. That’s a very narrow way of assessing them,” Carter biographer Jonathan Alter told the Associated Press. “We should judge them by how they changed the country and the world for the better. On that score, Jimmy Carter is not in the first rank of American presidents, but he stands up quite well.”

Later in life, Carter conceded that many Americans, even those too young to remember his tenure, judged him ineffective for failing to contain inflation or interest rates, end the energy crisis or quickly bring home American hostages in Iran. He gained admirers instead for his work at The Carter Center — advocating globally for public health, human rights and democracy since 1982 — and the decades he and Rosalynn wore hardhats and swung hammers with Habitat for Humanity.

Yet the common view that he was better after the Oval Office than in it annoyed Carter, and his allies relished him living long enough to see historians reassess his presidency.

“He doesn’t quite fit in today’s terms” of a left-right, red-blue scoreboard, said U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, who visited the former president multiple times during his own White House bid.

At various points in his political career, Carter labeled himself “progressive” or “conservative” — sometimes both at once. His most ambitious health care bill failed — perhaps one of his biggest legislative disappointments — because it didn’t go far enough to suit liberals. Republicans, especially after his 1980 defeat, cast him as a left-wing cartoon.

It would be easiest to classify Carter as a centrist, Buttigieg said, “but there’s also something radical about the depth of his commitment to looking after those who are left out of society and out of the economy.”

‘Country come to town’

Indeed, Carter’s legacy is stitched with complexities, contradictions and evolutions — personal and political.

The self-styled peacemaker was a war-trained Naval Academy graduate who promised Democratic challenger Ted Kennedy that he’d “kick his ass.” But he campaigned with a call to treat everyone with “respect and compassion and with love.”

Carter vowed to restore America’s virtue after the shame of Vietnam and Watergate, and his technocratic, good-government approach didn’t suit Republicans who tagged government itself as the problem. It also sometimes put Carter at odds with fellow Democrats.

The result still was a notable legislative record, with wins on the environment, education, and mental health care. He dramatically expanded federally protected lands, began deregulating air travel, railroads and trucking, and he put human rights at the center of U.S. foreign policy. As a fiscal hawk, Carter added a relative pittance to the national debt, unlike successors from both parties.

Carter nonetheless struggled to make his achievements resonate with the electorate he charmed in 1976. Quoting Bob Dylan and grinning enthusiastically, he had promised voters he would “never tell a lie.” Once in Washington, though, he led like a joyless engineer, insisting his ideas would become reality and he’d be rewarded politically if only he could convince enough people with facts and logic.

This served him well at Camp David, where he brokered peace between Israel’s Menachem Begin and Epypt’s Anwar Sadat, an experience that later sparked the idea of The Carter Center in Atlanta. Carter’s tenacity helped the center grow to a global force that monitored elections across five continents, enabled his freelance diplomacy and sent public health experts across the developing world. The center’s wins were personal for Carter, who hoped to outlive the last Guinea worm parasite, and nearly did.

As president, though, the approach fell short when he urged consumers beleaguered by energy costs to turn down their thermostats. Or when he tried to be the nation’s cheerleader, beseeching Americans to overcome a collective “crisis of confidence.”

Republican Ronald Reagan exploited Carter’s lecturing tone with a belittling quip in their lone 1980 debate. “There you go again,” the former Hollywood actor said in response to a wonky answer from the sitting president. “The Great Communicator” outpaced Carter in all but six states.

Carter later suggested he “tried to do too much, too soon” and mused that he was incompatible with Washington culture: media figures, lobbyists and Georgetown social elites who looked down on the Georgians and their inner circle as “country come to town.”

A ‘leader of conscience’ on race and class

Carter carefully navigated divides on race and class on his way to the Oval Office.

Born Oct. 1, 1924, Carter was raised in the mostly Black community of Archery, just outside Plains, by a progressive mother and white supremacist father. Their home had no running water or electricity but the future president still grew up with the relative advantages of a locally prominent, land-owning family in a system of Jim Crow segregation.

He wrote of President Franklin Roosevelt’s towering presence and his family’s Democratic Party roots, but his father soured on FDR, and Jimmy Carter never campaigned or governed as a New Deal liberal. He offered himself as a small-town peanut farmer with an understated style, carrying his own luggage, bunking with supporters during his first presidential campaign and always using his nickname.

And he began his political career in a whites-only Democratic Party.

As private citizens, he and Rosalynn supported integration as early as the 1950s and believed it inevitable. Carter refused to join the White Citizens Council in Plains and spoke out in his Baptist church against denying Black people access to worship services.

“This is not my house; this is not your house,” he said in a churchwide meeting, reminding fellow parishioners their sanctuary belonged to God.

Yet as the appointed chairman of Sumter County schools he never pushed to desegregate, thinking it impractical after the Supreme Court’s 1954 Brown v. Board decision. And while presidential candidate Carter would hail the 1965 Voting Rights Act, signed by fellow Democrat Lyndon Johnson when Carter was a state senator, there is no record of Carter publicly supporting it at the time.

Carter overcame a ballot-stuffing opponent to win his legislative seat, then lost the 1966 governor’s race to an arch-segregationist. He won four years later by avoiding explicit mentions of race and campaigning to the right of his rival, who he mocked as “Cufflinks Carl” — the insult of an ascendant politician who never saw himself as part the establishment.

Carter’s rural and small-town coalition in 1970 would match any victorious Republican electoral map in 2024. Once elected, though, Carter shocked his white conservative supporters — and landed on the cover of Time magazine — by declaring that “the time for racial discrimination is over.”

Before making the jump to Washington, Carter befriended the family of slain civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr., whom he’d never sought out as he eyed the governor’s office. Carter lamented his foot-dragging on school integration as a “mistake.” But he also met, conspicuously, with Alabama’s segregationist Gov. George Wallace to accept his primary rival’s endorsement ahead of the 1976 Democratic convention.

“He very shrewdly took advantage of his own Southerness,” said Amber Roessner, a University of Tennessee professor and expert on Carter’s campaigns.

A coalition of Black voters and white moderate Democrats ultimately made Carter the last Democratic presidential nominee to sweep the Deep South. Then, just as he did in Georgia, he used his power in office to appoint more non-whites than all his predecessors had, combined.

He once acknowledged “the secret shame” of white Americans who didn’t fight segregation. But he also told Alter that doing more would have sacrificed his political viability – and thus everything he accomplished in office and after.

King’s daughter, Bernice King, described Carter as wisely “strategic” in winning higher offices to enact change. “He was a leader of conscience,” she said in an interview.

Rosalynn was Carter’s closest advisor

Rosalynn Carter, who died on Nov. 19 at the age of 96, was identified by both husband and wife as the “more political” of the pair; she sat in on Cabinet meetings and urged him to postpone certain priorities, like pressing the Senate to relinquish control of the Panama Canal.

“Let that go until the second term,” she would sometimes say.

The president, recalled her former aide Kathy Cade, retorted that he was “going to do what’s right” even if “it might cut short the time I have.”

Rosalynn held firm, Cade said: “She’d remind him you have to win to govern.”

Carter also was the first president to appoint multiple women as Cabinet officers. Yet by his own telling, his career sprouted from chauvinism in the Carters’ early marriage: He did not consult Rosalynn when deciding to move back to Plains in 1953 or before launching his state Senate bid a decade later.

Many years later, he called it “inconceivable” that he didn’t confer with the woman he described as his “full partner,” at home, in government and at The Carter Center.

“We developed a partnership when we were working in the farm supply business, and it continued when Jimmy got involved in politics,” Rosalynn Carter told AP in 2021.

So deep was their trust that when Carter remained tethered to the White House in 1980 as 52 Americans were held hostage in Tehran, it was Rosalynn who campaigned on her husband’s behalf.

“I just loved it,” she said, despite the bitterness of defeat.

Reevaluating his legacy

Fair or not, the label of a disastrous presidency had leading Democrats keep their distance, at least publicly, for many years, but Carter managed to remain relevant, writing books and weighing in on societal challenges.

He lamented widening wealth gaps and the influence of money in politics. He voted for democratic socialist Bernie Sanders over Hillary Clinton in 2016, and later declared that America had devolved from fully functioning democracy to “oligarchy.”

Yet looking ahead to 2020, with Sanders running again, Carter warned Democrats not to “move to a very liberal program,” lest they help re-elect President Donald Trump. Carter scolded the Republican for his serial lies and threats to democracy, and chided the U.S. establishment for misunderstanding Trump’s populist appeal.

He delighted in yearly convocations with Emory University freshmen, often asking them to guess how much he’d raised in his two general election campaigns. “Zero,” he’d gesture with a smile, explaining the public financing system candidates now avoid so they can raise billions. Carter still remained quite practical in partnering with wealthy corporations and foundations to advance Carter Center programs.

Carter recognized that economic woes and the Iran crisis doomed his presidency, but offered no apologies for appointing Paul Volcker as the Federal Reserve chairman whose interest rate hikes would not curb inflation until Reagan’s presidency. He was proud of getting all the hostages home without starting a shooting war, even though Tehran would not free them until Reagan’s Inauguration Day.

“Carter didn’t look at it” as a failure, Alter emphasized. “He said, ‘They came home safely.’ And that’s what he wanted.”

Well into their 90s, the Carters greeted visitors at Plains’ Maranatha Baptist Church, where he taught Sunday School and where he will have his last funeral before being buried on family property alongside Rosalynn. Carter, who made the congregation’s collection plates in his woodworking shop, still garnered headlines there, calling for women’s rights within religious institutions, many of which, he said, “subjugate” women in church and society.

Carter was not one to dwell on regrets. “I am at peace with the accomplishments, regret the unrealized goals and utilize my former political position to enhance everything we do,” he wrote around his 90th birthday.

Pilgrimages to Plains

The politician who had supposedly hated Washington politics also enjoyed hosting Democratic presidential contenders as public pilgrimages to Plains became advantageous again. Carter sat with Buttigieg for the final time March 1, 2020, hours before the Indiana mayor ended his campaign and endorsed eventual winner Joe Biden.

“He asked me how I thought the campaign was going,” Buttigieg said, recalling that Carter flashed his signature grin and nodded along as the young candidate, born a year after Carter left office, “put the best face” on the walloping he endured the day before in South Carolina.

Never breaking his smile, the 95-year-old host fired back, “I think you ought to drop out.”

“So matter of fact,” Buttigieg said with a laugh. “It was somehow encouraging.”

Carter had lived enough, won plenty and lost enough to take the long view.

“He talked a lot about coming from nowhere,” Buttigieg said, not just to attain the presidency but to leverage “all of the instruments you have in life” and “make the world more peaceful.”

In his farewell address as president, Carter said as much to the country that had embraced and rejected him.

“The struggle for human rights overrides all differences of color, nation or language,” he declared. “Those who hunger for freedom, who thirst for human dignity and who suffer for the sake of justice — they are the patriots of this cause.”

Carter pledged to remain engaged with and for them as he returned “home to the South where I was born and raised,” home to Plains, where that young lieutenant had indeed become “a fellow citizen of the world.”

 

Christopher Beha: A.I. Isn’t Genius. We Are.

Courtesy of The New York Times

Dear Commons Community,

Christopher Beha, a novelist, had guest essay in yesterday’s New York Times entitled, “A.I. Isn’t Genius. We Are.”  His main theme is that:

“I am talking not about the quite reasonable anxiety surrounding the potential social and economic disruption of a powerful new technology but about the fundamental worry that a digital machine might one day exhibit — or exceed — the kind of creative power we once believed unique to our species. Of course, the technology is still relatively young, and it might make good on many of its promises. But the obsolescence of human culture will almost certainly not come to pass.

The root of this worry is not an overestimation of technology but a radical underestimation of humanity….”

He concludes:

“There are many reasons our culture has largely given up on geniuses, some of them very good. We’re living in a thoroughly fraudulent era whose signature figures, from Donald Trump to Sam Bankman-Fried, have made the claim of genius central to their frauds. We are also increasingly sensitive to the harm caused when genuine creative talent is excused for abusive behavior. On all fronts, we have become rightly impatient with those who make up their own rules.

But our suspicion of genius runs much deeper than the social and political turmoil of the past decade. In fact, it’s as old as the concept of genius itself. While Socrates inspired a nearly religious devotion in his followers, many Athenians found him frankly ridiculous. Still others found him dangerous, and this faction managed to sentence him to death, a verdict he accepted with equanimity. (He didn’t mind leaving this life, he reported, because his genius had nothing to say against it.)

Many of the holy figures of medieval Christianity resembled Socrates not just in their humility and simplicity but also in the threat they posed to the surrounding society whose norms they rejected. Often enough they faced death at that society’s hands as well. Even Kant noted the perpetual challenge of distinguishing the genius from the charlatan: “Nonsense, too, can be original,” he acknowledged.

What seems to have changed more recently is not our understanding of the risk of the pseudo-genius but our suspicion of the very possibility of genius of the genuine sort, and this has everything to do with the larger cultural developments of the past 50 years. If the critical turn “means anything,” the American theorist Fredric Jameson wrote in a classic study of postmodernism, it signals the end of “quaint romantic values such as that of the genius.” From the vantage point of cognitive science, meanwhile, the classic notion of genius makes no sense. Clearly some people have more processing power than others, but the idea of some cognitive quality other than sheer intelligence is incoherent.

Our culture seems now to reserve the designation of genius almost exclusively for men who have put quantitative skill to work in accumulating enormous wealth. Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk have all been awarded the status at one time or another. In the process we have rendered the term useless. When the clearest sign of genius is a net worth in 10 figures, we have come a long way from the ascetic outsider who suffers for the truth. Under such conditions, it’s hardly surprising that the term is treated as a cynical bit of marketing we’d be better off without.

Yet we might have given up more than we can afford to lose, as the great A.I. panic demonstrates. Ironically, our single greatest fear about A.I. is that it will stop following the rules we have given it and take all its training in unpredictable directions. In other words, we are worried that a probabilistic language-prediction model will somehow show itself to be not just highly intelligent but also possessed of real genius.

Luckily, we have little reason to think that a computer program is capable of such a thing. On the other hand, we have ample reason to think that human beings are. Believing again in genius means believing in the possibility that something truly new might come along to change things for the better. It means trusting that the best explanation will not always be the most cynical one, that certain human achievements require — and reward — a level of attention incompatible with rushing to write the first reply. It means recognizing that great works of art exist to be encountered and experienced, not just recycled. Granted, it also means making oneself vulnerable to the pseudo-genius, the charlatan, the grifter. But belief of any kind entails this sort of risk, and it seems to me a risk worth taking, especially when the alternative is a stultifying knowingness.

If we really are better off without the Romantic idea that certain people are exceptions to the general rule of humanity, that they will favor us with their insight if only we don’t force them to abide by the constraints that apply to the rest of us, perhaps we could instead return to the old Socratic-mystic idea that genius might visit any of us at any time. There is a voice waiting to whisper in our ears.

Everything about our culture at the moment seems designed to eliminate the space for careful listening, but the first step in restoring that space might be acknowledging that the voice is out there and allowing that it might have something important to say.”

A heavy but interesting message!

Tony

 

 

 

Elon Musk calls MAGA supporters ‘contemptible fools’

Dear Commons Community,

Elon Musk labeled some MAGA supporters as “contemptible fools” as the online debate around visas for highly skilled workers on the right intensifies.

A Trump world civil war has been brewing this week as Musk, and his “Department of Government Efficiency” (DOGE) partner Vivek Ramaswamy have found themselves on the opposite end of the legal immigration debate with the anti-immigration contingent of the MAGA base.  As reported by The Hill.

On Friday, right-leaning “Dilbert” cartoonist Scott Adams chimed in on the debate, which has largely taken place on the social media platform X, arguing that “MAGA is taking a page from Democrats on how to lose elections while feeling good about themselves.”

Musk, who has defended foreign-born engineers, agreed with Adams and said “those contemptible fools must be removed from the Republican Party, root and stem.”

The tech mogul, who dropped at least $250 million backing Trump’s second White House run, then clarified that “the ‘contemptible fools’ I’m referring to are those in the Republican Party who are hateful, unrepentant racists. They will absolutely be the downfall of the Republican Party if they are not removed.”

Ramaswamy ignited the firestorm Thursday when he, in part, argued that the lack of U.S.-born engineers in the job market was due to American culture that “has venerated mediocrity over excellence for way too long.” Musk, who has gotten closer to Trump over the course of this year, defended Ramaswamy.

Then, far-right provocateur Laura Loomer chimed in, criticizing President-elect Trump’s selection of Sriram Krishnan as White House policy adviser on artificial intelligence. Loomer went after Krishnan for his November post where he proposed immigration changes: “Anything to remove country caps for green cards / unlock skilled immigration would be huge.”

The debate then shifted focus to the H-1B visa program, which is an employer-sponsored visa created for high-skilled professionals that has allowed tech companies to employ foreigners in tech and computer-related positions. The portion of the MAGA base argued the system undercuts opportunities for American workers.

Loomer, who has accused Musk of censoring her post on X over her immigration remarks, fired back at the Tesla owner and said he was not living up to his ideal of being a “free speech absolutist” in regards to his “contemptible fool” comments.

“@elonmusk has been a Republican for 5 minutes and now he wants to decide who gets to be a Republican,” she wrote Friday on X. “Elon, you said you were a free speech absolutist. If you are, let’s please let all ideas flourish and we will let the best ideas win. Let’s embrace free speech absolutism.”

Trouble in MAGA World!

Tony

New Hope PA: Rain and Train!

New Hope Valley and Ivyland Santa Train

Dear Commons Community,

Saturday was a rainy day in New Hope so Elaine and I could not do much walking and instead took a ride on the New Hope Valley and Ivyland Santa Train. The conductor said that the coach car we rode in was built in 1925 by Baldwin Locomotive Works of Philadelphia.  On the ride we saw the Bucks County country side and passed by a swathe of woods severely damaged by wild fires two months ago during the drought.  Inside the car we were visited by Santa Claus, Mrs. Claus, and a banjo player who led the passengers in renditions of Jingle Bells, Rudolph the Read-Nose Reindeer and other Christmas songs.  Everyone especially the children sang and enjoyed it. During the ride we drank hot cocoa laced with Baileys. All in all, a fun trip.

In the evening we had dinner at Martines and went for a drizzly walk to see the decorations in the town.

Tomorrow we head back home to North Salem.

Tony

 

 

 

New Hope, PA: Ghost Light and Anastasia the Musical

Dear Commons Community,

Elaine and I had a fine day in New Hope yesterday.  We are staying at the Ghost Light Inn.

For those of us who do not know what a ghost light is, it is a light left on in a theater when it’s empty, usually on the stage. It’s a safety measure to help people avoid hazards like the edge of the stage, bumps, and working equipment.  Ghost lights are also said to have a spiritual meaning, with some believing they ward away evil spirits or light the way for ghosts that inhabit the theater. In any case, the Ghost Light Inn is proving to be an fine accommodation right in the middle of New Hope.

The highlight of our day was seeing the musical, Anastasia, at the Bucks County Playhouse. It is an excellent fast-paced production with marvelous acting, singing and dancing.  A wonderful two and a half hours of entertainment.

We finished our day at dinner at the Black Bass Hotel and Restaurant just outside of New Hope.

Tony

Nikki Haley rips Vivek Ramaswamy: ‘Nothing wrong’ with American culture

Dear Commons Community,

Former United Nations Ambassador Nikki Haley slammed her onetime GOP presidential primary opponent Vivek Ramaswamy on Thursday for arguing American culture is to blame for a lack of U.S.-born engineers.  As reported by The Hill.

“There is nothing wrong with American workers or American culture,” Haley wrote in a post on the social platform X. “All you have to do is look at the border and see how many want what we have. We should be investing and prioritizing in Americans, not foreign workers.”

Ramaswamy, who is set to co-chair the “Department of Government Efficiency” alongside Elon Musk, suggested Thursday that Silicon Valley hires more foreign-born engineers because American culture has “venerated mediocrity over excellence for way too long.”

“A culture that celebrates the prom queen over the math olympiad champ, or the jock over the valedictorian, will not produce the best engineers,” he said.

“This can be our Sputnik moment,” Ramaswamy added. “We’ve awaken from slumber before & we can do it again. Trump’s election hopefully marks the beginning of a new golden era in America, but only if our culture fully wakes up.”

The back-and-forth between Haley and Ramaswamy is reminiscent of the barbs the two traded on the campaign trail as they both contended for the Republican presidential nomination last year.

Haley called the tech entrepreneur “scum” after he brought up her daughter at the third GOP primary debate last November, while Ramaswamy called the former U.N. ambassador a “fascist” at the fourth debate just weeks later.

The latest tiff between the two comes as the Silicon Valley conservatives, who have increasingly become involved in President-elect Trump’s incoming administration, find themselves at odds with their fellow Republicans on some immigration policies.

Tech leaders such as Musk and Ramaswamy have argued that immigration of highly skilled people is important for the industry, even as they support Trump’s plans for mass deportations.

“OF COURSE my companies and I would prefer to hire Americans and we DO, as that is MUCH easier than going through the incredibly painful and slow work visa process,” Musk wrote on X on Wednesday. “HOWEVER, there is a dire shortage of extremely talented and motivated engineers in America.”

There are shortages in many areas due to a booming economy. So why deport other immigrants who are needed for agriculture, construction and other manual industries.

Tony

 

Visiting New Hope, PA for a few days!

Dear Commons Community,

Elaine and I are visiting New Hope, Pennsylvania for a few days.  In the 1980s, we came here several times when it was a sleepy little town with a small center and  the Bucks County Playhouse. It has grown considerably in the forty years since. Below is  a description from the New Hope website. We are staying at the Ghost Light Inn which is on the same property as the Playhouse.

Tony

 

———————————————————————————

New Hope, Pennsylvania has been named the #1 small town for arts and culture in the United States by Travel + Leisure, as part of their America’s Best Small Towns series! Located directly adjacent to the Delaware River, this scenic town is home to eclectic shopping, riverside restaurants, and cultural attractions, making it the perfect little getaway for artists alike during the picturesque winter season, as told by Thrillist, Northern Virginia Mag, and Lonely Planet.