Video:  Republican Governor Asa Hutchinson Calls Trump’s 2020 Election Fixation A ‘Recipe For Disaster in 2022’

Dear Commons Community,

On Sunday, during an NBC Meet the Press interview, Arkansas Governor Asa Hutchinson (R) said that former President Donald Trump’s ongoing comments about the 2020 election are “not constructive” and could spell disaster for the GOP in the 2022 midterms (see video. Hutchinson’s comment comes at about the 6:25 mark).

Hutchinson was asked” about a Trump statement released last week  that said Republicans “will not be voting” in the 2022 midterm election and the 2024 presidential election unless the party “solves” his debunked allegations about 2020 voter fraud.

“Relitigating 2020 is a recipe for disaster in 2022,” Hutchinson said. “Let’s talk about the future. The election is past. It’s been certified. The states made decisions on the integrity of each of their elections and made improvements where need be.”

He added: “It’s about the future. It’s not about the last election. And those kinds of comments are not constructive.”

Hutchinson was among a smattering of sitting Republican officials to publicly acknowledge President Joe Biden won the 2020 election in the weeks after the Nov. 3 vote. At the time, most Republicans had remained silent or stood behind Trump as he refused to concede and brayed about supposed electoral fraud.

Nearly a year since the election, Trump continues to devote considerable energy to pushing conspiracy theories that the election was stolen from him, despite dozens of failed legal challenges, recounts and audits that confirmed Biden’s victory.

Trump openly admitted at a recent rally that the issue is the one that gets him the most attention and “biggest cheers.”

Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) made a similar prediction to Hutchinson on “Meet The Press” last Sunday.

“If we relitigate 2020 over and over again, it won’t change the result in 2020, but we are sure to lose in 2024,” he said. “If we choose to look forward, bringing positive solutions to the American people who have needs, we win. If we choose to be bullied, we lose.”

We need more Republicans to tell it like it is about Trump’s obsession and delusion!

Tony

CNN Reporting that Colin Powell, military leader and first Black US secretary of state, dies after complications from Covid-19!

 

 

Dear Commons Community,

CNN is reporting this morning that Colin Powell, the first Black US secretary of state whose leadership in several Republican administrations helped shape American foreign policy in the last years of the 20th century and the early years of the 21st, has died from complications from Covid-19. He was 84.

“General Colin L. Powell, former U.S. Secretary of State and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, passed away this morning due to complications from Covid 19,” the Powell family wrote on Facebook.

“We have lost a remarkable and loving husband, father, grandfather and a great American,” they said, noting he was fully vaccinated.

Powell was a distinguished and trailblazing professional soldier whose career took him from combat duty in Vietnam to becoming the first Black national security adviser during the end of Ronald Reagan’s presidency and the youngest and first African American chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff under President George H.W. Bush. His national popularity soared in the aftermath of the US-led coalition victory during the Gulf War, and for a time in the mid-90s, he was considered a leading contender to become the first Black President of the United States. But his reputation would be forever stained when, as George W. Bush’s first secretary of state, he pushed faulty intelligence before the United Nations to advocate for the Iraq War, which he would later call a “blot” on his record.

I thought he was a remarkable soldier, statesman, and individual.  He also was a graduate of City College here in New York and was born and raised in the South Bronx.

A true leader and hero!

Tony

Video: Republican Senator Bill Cassidy Says He Wouldn’t Vote For Trump in 2024!

Dear Commons Community,

Senator Bill Cassidy (R-La.) said yesterday that he would not vote for Donald Trump if he ran for president again in 2024.

During an interview with Axios co-founder Mike Allen (see video above), Cassidy said he doesn’t know if Trump will run in 2024, but disputed the assumption that the former president would win the GOP nomination if he did.

“President Trump is the first president ― in the Republican side at least ― to lose the House, the Senate and the presidency in four years. Elections are about winning,” he said.

“If you want to win the presidency ― and hopefully that’s what voters are thinking about ― I think he might [not win the nomination],” he added.

Allen observed that it was “clear you ain’t voting for him.”

“I’m not,” Cassidy said.

It’s not the first time the Louisiana Republican has been among a small minority in his party to break from Trump. He was one of seven GOP senators to vote to convict Trump at the January impeachment trial.

Trump was impeached by the House for inciting the Jan. 6 insurrection on the U.S. Capitol but acquitted by the Senate.

Cassidy told Allen he voted to convict because he took “an oath to support and defend the Constitution. And when there was a pattern of behavior that culminated as it did on January the 6th — and we’ve had revelations since — that just led me to that decision.”

He was censured by the Louisiana Republican party for doing so. Asked about it, Cassidy said: “Yeah they just chose to censure. I slept very well that night.”

The Republicans need more political leaders like Cassidy who puts their country ahead of party.

Tony

 

Video: Former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates on Afghanistan Troop Withdrawal!

Dear Commons Community,

Former Secretary of Defense Robert Gates sat down with Anderson Cooper on Sunday’s 60 Minutes, where he described being physically ill upon seeing the US’s withdrawal from Afghanistan (see video above) back in August.

“It was really tough. For a few days there, I actually wasn’t feeling very well. And I realized, it was because of what was happening in Kabul. And I was just so low about the way it had ended,” Gates said. “The other feeling that I had was that it probably did not need to have turned out that way.”

When it comes to who is to blame for the chaos surrounding the withdrawal, Gates said there is plenty of blame to go around, including both the current and former presidents.

“Certainly the military considers withdrawal the most dangerous part of an operation. But they really had a lot of time to plan. Beginning with the deal that President Trump cut with the Taliban. So that was in February of 2020,” Gates said. “Once president Biden reaffirmed that there was going to be a firm deadline date, that’s the point at which I think they should have begun bringing those people out.”

Gates, who oversaw the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan from 2006 to 2011, blames himself in part for not properly building up the Afghan military over the years, making things too sophisticated and logistical, similar to the US military but very different from the Taliban. But he said that, ultimately, mismanagement of the timeline and not anticipating the fall-out were the biggest mistakes.

“You’d have to be pretty naïve not to assume things were going to go downhill once that withdrawal was complete,” Gates said, adding that he “absolutely” thinks Trump and Biden share responsibility.

While Gates, who’s always considered himself a republican, has been on the same page with Biden over the years when it comes to dealings with other foreign powers like Russia and China, he said they’ve never seen eye-to-eye on Afghanistan. When asked point-blank by Cooper if he thinks Biden made a mistake in Afghanistan, Gates said, “yes.”

Gates tells it like it is!

Tony

 

Pamela Paul Makes the Case for File Cabinets!

Dear Commons Community,

Pamela Paul, editor for the Times Book Review and author of 100 Things We’ve Lost to the Internet, has a guest essay in this morning’s New York Times, making the case for file cabinets that at one time were part of our innermost lives. She comments:

“Most of us paper-based people accumulated our fair share of these cabinets, which held, as such things do, a carefully organized history of one’s past: artwork, by grade; camp letters, by year; cards, birthday; cards, Valentine’s Day; cards, other; insurance forms; house deeds; medical records. Birth certificates, tax receipts, diplomas, fading photocopies of Social Security cards. Who knew when one scrap or another might prove useful?

…And how all of this must sound so archaic and pointless to the Gen Z employee heading off to work in the cloud.”

I must say that I had forgotten the file cabinets that use to ring my office.  However, I still keep one small file in a desk drawer in my home office for my income tax documentation.  Sorry!

Below is Ms. Paul’s entire essay.  File it under “P”!

Tony

——————————————————————————————————————

The New York Times

The Case for File Cabinets

Oct. 16, 2021

By Pamela Paul

Ms. Paul is the editor of the Book Review and the author, most recently, of “100 Things We’ve Lost to the Internet.”

Remember filing cabinets? Those lumbering, clattering towers of drawers stuffed full of Pendaflex folders? They were once vital to every workplace, as much a part of the landscape as desks and chairs. There was always a warren of them in a back room somewhere, and no matter what your eventual profession, if you ever served time as an intern, an executive assistant, a clerk or a catalog manager, you filed. You filed and filed until your thumbs wore down. You’d painstakingly recenter those metal rods, always prone to slipping free; you’d occasionally handwrite a label onto the perforated fragment of paper nested inside each plastic tab, folding it just so and inserting it, only to see it worm out the other end. And only after you’d climbed a few rungs on the corporate ladder could you let all this filing go to someone else, another rung down.

But filing wasn’t just for the office; files were part of our innermost personal lives. (Let’s not forget that the portal into John Malkovich’s mind lurked behind — why, yes — a file cabinet.) For a young adult, acquiring your first metal contraption, or one of those brown accordion files with the little figure-eight string closure, was part of becoming a grown-up. It was no longer Mom’s job to keep track of your life’s paperwork. It was on you.

Most of us paper-based people accumulated our fair share of these cabinets, which held, as such things do, a carefully organized history of one’s past: artwork, by grade; camp letters, by year; cards, birthday; cards, Valentine’s Day; cards, other; insurance forms; house deeds; medical records. Birth certificates, tax receipts, diplomas, fading photocopies of Social Security cards. Who knew when one scrap or another might prove useful?

This all must sound so archaic and pointless to the Gen Z employee heading off to work in the cloud. What was this paperwork of which you speak?, they ask. This “pushing papers” people once supposedly engaged in — didn’t things get lost, forgotten, overlooked?

Answer: Yes, sometimes. Sometimes one had to locate something in an unfamiliar file hidden according to some unknown person’s inscrutable clerical system. Sometimes one had to clean out an entire tower and load its contents into cardboard boxes built especially for deep storage, and no matter how hard one tried to keep these relocated files in upright order, they would cascade forward in domino fashion and need to be rebuilt.

Today, digitally functional people don’t have to deal with any of this. They have scans of all they need lodged in virtual spaces. They can print out documents as necessary, but this, effectively, means never, because scanned items can simply be transferred from one place to another through secure and password-protected pathways, then kept on assorted drives (flash, hard, shared).

Surely this is more organized. Surely it is more efficient and secure. Surely it is cleaner and more environmentally friendly (especially if we ignore the power required to keep the servers running). On these unearthly planes, it’s harder for people to accidentally stumble across something they weren’t meant to see (darn); no forgotten documents peek out mischievously from a manila folder begging to be read (ooh). No longer does the simple act of rifling turn up something damning or private; it now requires special I.T. skills to sneak such files open.

Yet not being able to find these things — whether we were meant to or not — also means we’ve lost something too.

A good filing system could be strangely inspiring. For three months, I worked at Time Inc. with a woman named Charlotte whose ability to color coordinate paperwork left me quaking with inferiority, yet fueled with a certain ambition to go about my own business in a more logical and accessible way. As onerous as it might be, the very process of filing things physically helped to organize your work life and your life life. In the same way people acquire and retain information better when handwriting rather than keyboarding, manually going through papers and positioning them in a physical space reinforces the information.

For those with a tactile or visual orientation, placing documents in a particular place imprints them in your brain: the folded corner, the weight and smell of the paper. “I remember putting that memo with the chart here in the back,” you’d think to yourself, making your way to the rear of filing cabinet K-M.

During this early paperbound era, I acquired four hideous beige towers of four drawers each. Three of them now stand empty, reminders of a moment of weakness when, in an effort to “keep up with the times,” I let myself be persuaded that papers were no longer necessary — that everything could be either uploaded or downloaded. Feeling modern and free, I spent an afternoon throwing out years of accumulated magazine and newspaper clips. I got rid of printed-out transcripts from old book research. I let go of dozens of poorly written college essays. I released a fourth-grade report on the caribou into the wild.

In the wake of my Great File Purge, those cabinets loom reproachfully in my garage. It’s been years since I’ve even attempted to rattle free one of their jam-prone metal closures — hard to close, even harder to open. I am no longer certain what’s in them, but I can’t quite be fully persuaded they’re no longer necessary.

On the rare occasions I made it into those cabinets, a term paper for an anthropology class I’d forgotten about or a clipping from my hometown paper about the hurricane that knocked down our front tree might catch my eye and I’d be transported — a whoosh of nostalgia or the relief of thank-goodness-I-am-no-longer-you when I happened upon some youthful ephemera. But you don’t just happen upon such things among the uniform folder-shaped icons in the cloud or unfold their contents gingerly to discover something unexpected scribbled on the back. We have shut the door permanently on all of that.

 

New Book:  Chris Wallace with Mitch Weiss– “Countdown bin Laden”

 

 

Dear Commons Community,

Last week I finished reading Countdown 1945:  The Extraordinary Story of the Atom Bomb and the 116 Days that Changed the World by news anchor, Chris Wallace with Mitch Weiss. It was only natural that I pick up and read their current best-seller, Countdown bin Laden: The 247-Day Hunt to Bring the Mastermind of 9/11 to Justice. Even though the subject matter of the new book is a more familiar event that most of us remember, Wallace and Weiss’s treatment did not disappoint in its style and attention to details in the search for Osama bin Laden.  A critical element of the story is once they “think” that bin Laden is in a compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan, the CIA and others involved with tracking him down, have no definite proof.  Also, the nature of the commando-type raid by US Navy Seals is fraught with danger and peril.  There is a lot of decision making and process described here among President Barak Obama, Leon Panetta, Admiral  William McRaven and several other dedicated CIA and military personnel over whether to make a raid or not.  There is Secretary of Defense Robert Gates who keeps reminding the President of the disastrous attempt during the President Jimmy Carter administration to free hostages in Iran.

As with their earlier book, the last one hundred pages are riveting and you will not want to put it down.

Below is a brief review, courtesy of Publishers Weekly.

Tony

————————————————————

Publishers Weekly

Countdown bin Laden: The Untold Story of the 247–Day Hunt to Bring the Mastermind of 9/11 to Justice

Chris Wallace with Mitch Weiss

Fox News Sunday host Chris Wallace and Associated Press reporter Mitch Weiss follow Countdown 1945 with an engrossing if familiar account of the killing of al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden in May 2011. Toggling between key players including CIA director Leon Panetta; Admiral William McRaven, who planned the mission; and Navy SEAL Robert O’Neill, who fired the shots that killed bin Laden, the authors start in August 2010, when Panetta first learned that CIA agents had tracked a suspected al-Qaeda courier to a heavily fortified compound on a dead-end street in Abbottabad, Pakistan. Aerial surveillance led operatives to believe that a compound resident they nicknamed “the Pacer” might be bin Laden, though an attempt to collect DNA evidence confirming his identity through a CIA-funded vaccination program proved fruitless. Anxious to take action before the Pakistani government caught wind of the operation, President Obama made the “50-50 call” to authorize the raid, which got off to a rocky start when the lead helicopter went down. Synthesizing material from published memoirs, journalistic accounts, and interviews, the authors build a cohesive narrative, but break little new ground. Still, this is a cinematic overview of one of the CIA’s most heralded missions.

New crew docks at China’s first permanent space station!

In this photo released by Xinhua News Agency, screen image captured at Beijing Aerospace Control Center in Beijing, China, Saturday, Oct. 16, 2021 shows three Chinese astronauts, from left, Ye Guangfu, Zhai Zhigang and Wang Yaping waving after entering the space station core module Tianhe. China's Shenzhou-13 spacecraft carrying three Chinese astronauts on Saturday docked at its space station, kicking off a record-setting six-month stay as the country moves toward completing the new orbiting outpost. Chinese characters,  left, read "Platform Camera B." (Tian Dingyu/Xinhua via AP)

Chinese astronauts Ye Guangfu, Zhai Zhigang and Wang Yaping after entering the space station core module

Dear Commons Community,

The Associated Press reported this morning that Chinese astronauts began their six-month mission on China’s first permanent space station, after successfully docking aboard their spacecraft.

The astronauts, two men and a woman, were seen floating around the module before speaking via a live-streamed video.

The new crew includes Wang Yaping, 41, who is the first Chinese woman to board the Tiangong space station, and is expected to become China’s first female spacewalker.

“We’ll co-operate with each other, carefully conduct maneuvers, and try to accomplish all tasks successfully in this round of exploration of the universe,” said Wang in the video.

The space travelers’ Shenzhou-13 spacecraft was launched by a Long March-2F rocket at 12:23 a.m. Saturday and docked with the Tianhe core module of the space station at 6:56 a.m.

The three astronauts entered the station’s core module at about 10 a.m., the China Manned Space Agency said.

They are the second crew to move into China’s Tiangong space station, which was launched last April. The first crew stayed three months.

The new crew includes two veterans of space travel — Zhai Zhigang, 55, and Wang. The third member, Ye Guangfu, 41, is making his first trip to space.

The mission’s launch was seen off by a military band and supporters singing “Ode to the Motherland,” underscoring national pride in the space program, which has advanced rapidly in recent years.

The crew will do three spacewalks to install equipment in preparation for expanding the station, assess living conditions in the Tianhe module, and conduct experiments in space medicine and other fields.

China’s military-run space program plans to send multiple crews to the station over the next two years to make it fully functional.

When completed with the addition of two more sections — named Mengtian and Wentian — the station will weigh about 66 tons, much smaller than the International Space Station, which launched its first module in 1998 and weighs around 450 tons.

Two more Chinese modules are due to be launched before the end of next year during the stay of the yet-to-be-named Shenzhou-14 crew.

China’s Foreign Ministry on Friday renewed its commitment to cooperation with other nations in the peaceful use of space.

Spokesperson Zhao Lijian said sending humans into space was a “common cause of mankind.” China would “continue to extend the depth and breadth of international cooperation and exchanges” in crewed spaceflight and “make positive contributions to the exploration of the mysteries of the universe,” he said.

China was excluded from the International Space Station largely due to U.S. objections over the Chinese program’s secretive nature and close military ties, prompting it to launch two experimental modules before starting on the permanent station.

U.S. law requires congressional approval for contact between the American and Chinese space programs, but China is cooperating with space experts from other countries including France, Sweden, Russia and Italy. Chinese officials have said they look forward to hosting astronauts from other countries aboard the space station once it becomes fully functional.

China has launched seven crewed missions with a total of 14 astronauts aboard — two have flown twice — since 2003, when it became only the third country after the former Soviet Union and the United States to put a person in space on its own.

China has also expanded its work on lunar and Mars exploration, including landing a rover on the little-explored far side of the Moon and returning lunar rocks to Earth for the first time since the 1970s.

This year, China also landed its Tianwen-1 space probe on Mars, whose accompanying Zhurong rover has been exploring for evidence of life on the red planet.

Other Chinese space programs call for collecting soil from an asteroid and bringing back additional lunar samples. China has also expressed an aspiration to land people on the moon and possibly build a scientific base there, although no timeline has been proposed for such projects. A highly secretive space plane is also reportedly under development.

Good luck to these astronauts!

Tony

Conservative Charlie Sykes Torches ‘Absolutely Bats**t Crazy’ Republicans In Texas!

Charlie Sykes: 'I'm used to being disappointed' in Congress

Charlie Sykes

Dear Commons Community,

Conservative Charlie Sykes slammed Texas, Florida and Arizona Republicans for competing on “the most hair-on-fire culture war games.”

Yesterday, he lamented what he described as the “race to the bottom” to “see who can be the most MAGA” between Republicans in Florida, Arizona and Texas.

“I know that Republicans in Texas have been conservative for a long time but there was a time when conservative Republicans in Texas were not absolutely batshit crazy,” Sykes, founder of the conservative website The Bulwark, told MSNBC’s Nicolle Wallace in video shared online by Mediaite.

“Texas Republicans used to be respectable,” Sykes continued. “And now we are almost in this competition … between Florida, Arizona and Texas to see who can be the most MAGA, who can play the most hair-on-fire culture war games because that seems to be this race to the bottom that we’re talking about here.”

Sykes’ comments came during a discussion about a Texas law that instructs teachers to offer opposing perspectives on historical events. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott’s (R) recently banned COVID-19 vaccine mandates in the state which is also now subject to a highly restrictive abortion law.

A school administrator faced backlash this week after saying educators should “make sure that if you have a book on the Holocaust, that you have one” with alternative viewpoints.

Sykes said it was “easy to beat up on the administrator” but “the focus ought to be on the law and the fact that the teachers are terrified. They don’t know what’s going to happen.”

“What is the other side of the Holocaust?” Sykes later asked. “Are you going to assign fourth-graders ‘Mein Kampf’? Are you going to make them listen to Seb Gorka’s radio show? I just don’t know what she actually had in mind. But again, this is exactly what you get when you have politicians playing culture war and then trying to ram that into badly thought out draconian legislation.”

Rough language but Sykes has it right!

Tony

 

The 2021 AAUP Shared Governance Survey: Findings on Demographics of Senate Chairs and Governance Structures!

 

Dear Commons Community,

Hans-Joerg Tiede, the Director of Research for the AAUP, gives a report in the current issue of  Academe on the 2021 AAUP Shared Governance Survey.  It provides data (see sample table above) on governance leaders at four-year colleges and universities. Here is an excerpt.

The 2021 AAUP Shared Governance Survey, the first such national survey in two decades, covered a wide range of topics related to academic gover­nance. I reported on responses to survey questions about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on governance and the relative authority of the faculty in various areas of academic decision-making in an online data snapshot titled “Survey Data on the Impact of the Pandemic on Shared Governance” and in the report Findings on Faculty Roles by Decision-Making Areas, respectively. This report focuses on responses to questions about the composition of senates and similar faculty governance bodies, faculty-board communication, and the conduct of presidential searches as well as questions about the demographic composition and professional character­istics of faculty governance leaders. I present the results by institutional control (public or private nonprofit); by Carnegie classification (distinguishing broadly between doctoral, master’s, and bachelor’s institutions); by institutional size, with institutions categorized as “small” (fewer than two thousand students), “medium” (between two thousand and five thousand students), or “large” (more than five thousand students); and by the collective bargaining status of tenured and tenure-track faculty members (at institutions with a tenure system) or full-time faculty members (at institutions without a tenure system). When possible, I also compare findings with results from previous national surveys on shared governance conducted or sponsored by the AAUP…

… Findings related to the demographics of senate chairs show that, as a group, they are overwhelmingly full-time faculty members at the higher ranks and, at tenure-granting institutions, have tenure. Compared with the overall racial and ethnic composition of full-time faculty members at four-year institutions, white faculty members are overrepresented, and Asian fac­ulty members, especially, are underrepresented among faculty governance leaders.

Interesting data on a population that has generally not been studied very much!

Tony

Student loans: ‘Landmark settlement’ reached in lawsuit over Public Servant Loan Forgiveness Program!

(Screenshot from Zoom conference)

Randi Weingarten

Dear Commons Community,

The American Federation of Teachers (AFT) and the US Department of Education (USDOE) announced a settlement on the  Public Servant Loan Forgiveness(PSLF) program  used by my many public service workers.

The AFT hailed the “landmark settlement” in the case of Weingarten v. DeVos — originally filed in July 2019 and titled after the AFT President Randi Weingarten and former Education Secretary Betsy DeVos — as an agreement that will “hold the federal government accountable for its failure to manage the PSLF.”

The news comes a week after the USDOE announced a series of major changes to the troubled PSLF program.

“This agreement unravels the problems of PSLF’s implementation and shows the power of advocacy and collective action,” Weingarten said in a statement, adding: “It represents a game-changing victory for the millions of educators, nurses, public employees, and other AFT members yoked to crushing monthly repayments that have upended their lives. And it gives muscle and teeth to the Education Department’s reforms to PSLF announced last week.”

The PSLF program, created by Congress in 2007, enables government and non-profit employees with federally-backed student loans to apply for forgiveness after proof of 120 monthly payments under a qualifying repayment plan.  As reported by Yahoo Finance.

”Yahoo Finance recently detailed the immense difficulties one professor faced while navigating the system over 12 years before ultimately receiving debt cancellation this year.

The embattled PSLF program has yielded an extremely low success rate — in the single digits for years — partly because many borrowers simply did not qualify. In 2018, Congress provided USDOE with $700 million to create the Temporary Expanded Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program (TEPSLF).

As of April 30, 2021, the latest date for which federal data is available, both programs still have anemic outcomes: According to Federal Student Aid, PSLF had an approval rate of 2%. Only 3,458 out of 168,702 completed PSLF forms submitted met the requirements for loan forgiveness. TEPSLF had an approval rate of 3.4%, with only 224 forms out of 6,629 forms meeting the government’s requirements.

Projections by the loan servicer handling the PSLF program also indicated that only 22% of borrowers are on track for forgiveness in the next five years, according to records obtained by the SBPC.

The settlement announced on Wednesday represented “a redemption and redeeming moment for a Department of Education who under the last administration, refused to listen to the people who teach in schools, who nurse in our hospitals, who fight fires,” Weingarten said in a press conference on Wednesday. “It’s clear that elections do matter.”

Addressing the PSLF program is a priority for the Biden administration.

During his nomination hearing in April, James Kvaal, now undersecretary of education (the top official in charge of colleges and universities) said that the administration was looking into PSLF and how to fix it.

In early October, USDOE announced temporary changes to how it was counting qualifying payments and more. The details of those changes can be found here.

Fixing the PSLF program could greatly help recruit more teachers, as school districts struggle to fill positions and as education jobs take a dip (as per the jobs report), former Education Secretary John B. King Jr. told Yahoo Finance Live earlier this week.

“We probably need help from Congress really to make that program as strong as possible,” King said. “There were definitely some bureaucratic hurdles that were created in the design of the program that made it hard for people to access.”

According to King, the previous administration did not consider fixing PSLF as it was not “not something they were interested in supporting, and that led to lots of folks getting rejected who should really have gotten their debt forgiven… the Biden administration is trying to right the ship there. Congress can help as well.”

Settlement’s implications for other PSLF applicants

The settlement reached by the AFT and ED accomplishes several things.

First, it discharges eight individual AFT member plaintiffs’ balances, which totals nearly $400,000.

Second, it allows for an official review of those who had their PSLF applications denied. Those denied applications will be reconsidered.

This will be an automatic review, if their application was denied prior to November 2020, especially if the borrower had at least 10 years of repayment on a direct loan.

Borrowers will receive credit for years of payments made in the past, and also get detailed notices telling them how many payments remain before they qualify for forgiveness, how they can find out which payments are qualifying, and whom to contact to receive guidance about how to obtain loan forgiveness.

On top of that, the settlement also promises to bring more transparency into the system, with publicly available audits of student loan servicer performance, publication of corrective action plans, public releases of data on why borrowers fail to qualify for PSLF, and improved data on turnaround times and outcomes.

Congratulations to Ms. Weingarten and the plaintiffs in this case.

Tony