Striking Oakland Teachers Reach Tentative Agreement!

 

Dear Commons Community,

Various media are reporting that the Oakland Unified School District and the union representing striking teachers have come to a tentative agreement after a week-long teacher strike.

The deal —an “historic no-concessions contract,” according to the union — comes after more than 3,000 teachers and staff walked off the job on February 21. The union reports that 95 percent of our members were on the picket line and 97 percent of students were out of school during the strike.

“When we strike, we win,” the Oakland Education Association‏ posted to Twitter ahead of a Friday evening press conference.

The new contract would provide teachers a raise of 14 percent, Oakland Unified School District announced Friday. That’s split into an an 11 percent on-going salary increase and a one-time 3 percent bonus for educators.

“Today marks a sea change for OUSD as we take a major step in support of our teachers and students,” the release quotes Superintendent Kyla Johnson-Trammell as saying. “Our teachers are the core of everything we do as a school district, and we are pleased to have reached a tentative agreement that shows them how valuable they are.”

The agreement also includes a decrease in class sizes and an increase in student support roles — including counselors, psychologists and speech pathologists — OEA announced. 

The tentative agreement will be subject to discussion and a member ratification vote, the union said. There will also be a 24-hour review period.

Oakland educators have worked without a contract since mid-2017. The teachers are the third group of public school educators from one of the nation’s 50 largest cities to strike this year after their Los Angeles and Denver counterparts. Chicago also had a charter school teachers’ strike.

Congratulations to the teachers, the union and the City of Oakland!

Tony

Trump Doesn’t Need Michael Cohen to be His Fixer – He Has the Entire GOP!

Representative Jim Jordan, who led the Republicans in questioning Michael Cohen

during the House Oversight and Reform Committee hearing, is one of Trump’s New Fixers

Dear Commons Community,

Timothy Egan, a contributing writer for the New York Times, has an op-ed today describing how the Republican Party has become Donald Trump’s fixer now that Michael Cohen has told all and is on his way to jail.  Egan describes how Republican leaders [and I would add Fox News] who started by making excuses for the president’s most repulsive personal traits have now moved on to bedrock principles.  Here is an excerpt( the full op-ed is below):

“The character sketch of Donald Trump by the keeper of his secrets [Cohen] was no surprise to anyone who has given a passing glance at the hulk of malevolence in the Oval Office. He cheats. He defrauds. He lies by way of respiration.

He thinks his son is an idiot, and that only suckers served in Vietnam. He believes blacks are incapable of governing. He acts like a gangster. He stiffs contractors and pays off porn stars. We knew all of that. Getting it under oath from a man who was once executive vice president and special counsel to Trump just gave historians a formality for the obvious.

But if Michael D. Cohen’s description of a president who morphed into “the worst version of himself” was not news, certainly the way Republicans took the baton from the ex-loyalist was. They have now become Trump’s fixers, doing his dirty work, issuing threats and ditching long-held principles like so many empty beer bottles thrown from a car.

It’s been clear, ever since the last of the never-Trumpers were rooted out of the party, that the G.O.P. would be an extension of the grime and grift of Trump’s personal brand.”  

Tony

—————————————————————————————————————–

 

After Cohen, Republicans Are Now Trump’s Fixers                  

By Timothy Egan

March 1, 2019

Representative Jim Jordan led the Republicans in questioning Michael Cohen during the House Oversight and Reform Committee hearing.CreditCreditSarah Silbiger/The New York Times

The character sketch of Donald Trump by the keeper of his secrets was no surprise to anyone who has given a passing glance at the hulk of malevolence in the Oval Office. He cheats. He defrauds. He lies by way of respiration.

He thinks his son is an idiot, and that only suckers served in Vietnam. He believes blacks are incapable of governing. He acts like a gangster. He stiffs contractors and pays off porn stars. We knew all of that. Getting it under oath from a man who was once executive vice president and special counsel to Trump just gave historians a formality for the obvious.

But if Michael D. Cohen’s description of a president who morphed into “the worst version of himself” was not news, certainly the way Republicans took the baton from the ex-loyalist was. They have now become Trump’s fixers, doing his dirty work, issuing threats and ditching long-held principles like so many empty beer bottles thrown from a car.

Cohen’s portrayal of the fraud in the White House, and the details of a Trump Organization run like a criminal enterprise, are not disqualifying to Republicans. Just the opposite. Trump is a racist, a con, a cheat, in Cohen’s words — but those are among the reasons people voted for him. Proving it only strengthens his standing with a large sector of the electorate and many members of Congress.

When Cohen described how Trump would fail to pay people who’d done work for him, or weaseled his way out of his share of taxes, or inflated his assets for what sounds like insurance and bank fraud — well, those are marks of a good businessman who knows how to game the system.

And when Cohen recounted Trump’s belief that he couldn’t name a country run by a black that wasn’t a “shithole,” he was also trashing the United States under President Barack Obama. But it’s an insult that has found a home in right-wing media.

“Every day, most of us knew we were coming in and we were going to lie for him,” Cohen said of a typical shift at Trump Tower. Professional prevarication on behalf of Trump “was normalized,” he said. “And no one around him questioned it. In fairness, no one around him today questions it, either.”

The hearing before the House committee proved his point. Did one Republican stand up and decry Cohen’s litany of presidential lies? They blasted Cohen the liar, but not the man he lied for. Did one Republican decry the $35,000 check — proof, as Cohen said, that “The president of the United States thus wrote a personal check for the payment of hush money as part of a criminal scheme to violate campaign finance laws”?

It’s been clear, ever since the last of the never-Trumpers were rooted out of the party, that the G.O.P. would be an extension of the grime and grift of Trump’s personal brand. But now the enablers are willing to do what Cohen said he once did for Trump — take a bullet for him.

Among Cohen’s duties as Trump fixer was to threaten people; he did this maybe 500 times, by his recounting. That job has been taken over by Republican elected officials like Representative Matt Gaetz of Florida. He threatened Cohen on the eve of his testimony, mentioning his family in an ominous tweet.

Initially, Gaetz compared witness intimidation to the “marketplace of ideas.” Sure. In the same way that pushing someone in a wheelchair down a flight of stairs is like a sled ride. Gaetz has taken his tweet back, but his crude attempt at thuggery stands out for how loathsome his party has become.

The creepy criminal world that surrounds Trump is not off-putting to many Republicans. It was R. Alexander Acosta who helped to negotiate the deal that gave a ridiculously low sentence to Trump’s billionaire buddy Jeffrey E. Epstein, accused of trafficking children for sex. Acosta is now Trump’s labor secretary, approved by the Republican Senate.

Trump had called Epstein, who pled guilty to soliciting prostitution, “a terrific guy,” adding that, “It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the young side.” This is disgusting.

Republicans who started down this road by making excuses for Trump’s most repulsive personal traits have moved on to bedrock principles. The party of deficit hawks didn’t blink at the trillion-dollar hole in the budget that came with the tax cut, so long as it gave Trump a “win.” They were fine with a president who sided with Vladimir Putin in a traitorous exchange in Helsinki. And the Senate majority leader, Mitch McConnell, who has fashioned himself as an institutional guardian of the Constitution, threw that document in a dumpster after he backed Trump’s brazen violation of the separation of powers.

They are headed for a reckoning. In years to come, people will ask, “What did we do to make sure our democracy is intact?” as Representative Elijah Cummings, the committee chairman, put it. For Trump’s new fixers, Cohen gave them an answer: “I did the same thing you’re doing now.”

 

University of California System Cancels Elsevier Subscriptions: Big Win for Open Access!

Dear Commons Community,

The University of California system announced yesterday that it was ending its contract with  Elsevier, one of the biggest for-profit academic publishers in the world.  The announcement that the 10-campus system would cancel its Elsevier subscriptions represents a major win for open-access advocates. And it may signal to other academic libraries that pay millions of dollars in subscriptions to large journal publishers that a retreat from those costly mass subscriptions is workable.  As reported in The Chronicle of Higher Education.

“The [California] system, which announced the decision on Thursday, had sought one contract that would cover the cost of subscriptions to Elsevier’s trove of journals in addition to the processing fees that make all UC research published in Elsevier journals freely available to all.

An Elsevier spokesman said the company had put forward a proposal that met the system’s request, including an option that would allow researchers to choose between publishing behind a paywall or paying a fee and publishing under an open-access model. The Chronicle has not seen the proposal.

“It is disappointing that the California Digital Library (CDL) has broken off negotiations unilaterally,” the spokesman, Tom Reller, wrote in an email, “but we hope we can bridge this divide with them soon.”

The system’s prior five-year contract with Elsevier had cost about $50 million, and UC is just the latest institution to back away from bulk subscription packages as library budgets tighten.

Last year, for example, Florida State University said it would not subscribe to the publishing behemoth’s journals in one bulk deal. Instead, it chose to maintain about $1 million in subscriptions to individual journals. In 2017, Elsevier published more than 430,000 articles in some 2,500 journals, according to the company.

Leverage in the negotiations between Elsevier and the UC system was held by faculty members who published in and edited for the company’s journals.

In a December letter, officials at the University of California at Los Angeles asked faculty members to consider declining to review articles for Elsevier journals until the contract talks progressed. Earlier this week the company emailed UC-based editors of Elsevier journals to explain its point of view and outline the model proposed to the system.

“Despite our best efforts, it is still possible we may not reach an agreement,” wrote Philippe Terheggen, managing director of Elsevier Journals. “We are making every effort to prevent a scenario where the UC loses access to new Elsevier content.”

On a system web page, UC has listed possible ways scholars in need of Elsevier articles could get access to them, including through an interlibrary loan, in online repositories like PubMed, and by simply contacting the author and asking for a copy.

In its announcement the university system cast its decision as a win for open access.

“I fully support our faculty, staff, and students in breaking down paywalls that hinder the sharing of groundbreaking research.”

“I fully support our faculty, staff, and students in breaking down paywalls that hinder the sharing of groundbreaking research,” said the system’s president, Janet A. Napolitano. “This issue does not just impact UC, but also countless scholars, researchers, and scientists across the globe — and we stand with them in their push for full, unfettered access.”

In an annual report published on Thursday, the company’s parent, RELX, reported revenue and profit growth, but it warned that the debate over paid subscriptions may pose an external risk for future earnings.”

BRAVO to the University of California!  Open access is alive and well!

Tony